Skip to main content

Volume 3 Supplement 1

Abstracts of the Breast Cancer Immunotherapy Symposium (BRECIS): Sidra Symposia Series

  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Systems biology analysis of gene expression data and gene network reverse-engineering approaches reveal NFAT5 as a candidate biomarker in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive and highly metastatic form of breast cancer [13]. In a recent study [4], we analysed breast cancer with peritumoral neoplastic lymphovascular invasion (ePVI) in comparison with inflammatory breast cancer, showing that ePVI breast cancer have more clinicopathologic affinity than differences with the most aggressive cancer in the breast. Here, we aim to identify potential master regulators (MRs) that drive the expression pattern in IBC.

Transcriptomic (i.e., mRNA) data from 197 breast tumours were used for this analysis (GEO GSE23720) [5]. All tumours were classified as “IBC” (n=63) or “nIBC” (n=134). To identify novel MRs that drive the IBC phenotype, all expression data were analysed using a network-based strategy (ARACNe [6]) and Master Regulator Analysis (MRA)[7]. We chose to perform in-vivo IHC analysis, in two independent cohorts of IBCs (n = 39), nIBCs (n = 82) and normal breast tissues (n = 15), for the top significant Master Regulators: MGA, CTNNB1 and NFAT5. Biological validation confirmed that NFAT5 expression was higher in IBC than in nIBC (70% vs. 20%) and that the majority of NFAT5-positive IBC samples displayed NFAT5 nuclear expression in comparison with nIBC samples (89% vs. 12%).

We provide evidence that NFAT5 transcription factor could constitute a novel IBC biomarker that could help to identify the most aggressive forms of BC into routine clinical practice.

References

  1. Levine PH, Steinhorn SC, Ries LG, Aron JL: Inflammatory breast cancer: the experience of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985, 74: 291-297.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cristofanilli M, Valero V, Buzdar AU, Kau SW, Broglio KR, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Sneige N, Islam R, Ueno NT, Buchholz TA, Singletary SE, Hortobagyi GN: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and patterns of recurrence: understanding the biology of a unique disease. Cancer. 2007, 110 (7): 1436-1444. 10.1002/cncr.22927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charafe-Jauffret E, Tarpin C, Viens P, Bertucci F: Defining the molecular biology of inflammatory breast cancer. Semin Oncol. 2008, 35 (1): 41-50. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manfrin E, Remo A, Pancione M, Cannizzaro C, Falsirollo F, Pollini GP, Pellini F, Molino A, Vendraminelli R, Ceccarelli M, Pagnotta SM, Simeone I, Bonetti F: Comparison between invasive breast cancer with extensive peritumoral vascular invasion and inflammatory breast carcinoma. A clinical pathological study of 161 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014, 142 (3): 299-306. 10.1309/AJCPOXKX67KRAOVM.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bekhouche I, Finetti P, Adelaïde J, Ferrari A, Tarpin C, Charafe-Jauffret E, Charpin C, Houvenaeghel G, Jacquemier J, Bidaut G, Birnbaum D, Viens P, Chaffanet M, Bertucci F: High-resolution comparative genomic hybridization of inflammatory breast cancer and identification of candidate genes. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (2): e16950-10.1371/journal.pone.0016950.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, Wiggins C, Stolovitzky G, DallaFavera R, Califano A: ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006, 7 (Suppl 1): S7-10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carro MS, Lim WK, Alvarez MJ, Bollo RJ, Zhao X, Snyder EY, Sulman EP, Anne SL, Doetsch F, Colman H, Lasorella A, Aldape K, Califano A, Iavarone A: The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours. Nature. 2010, 463 (7279): 318-25. 10.1038/nature08712.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Andrea Remo, Ines Simeone, Massimo Pancione and Michele Ceccarelli contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Remo, A., Simeone, I., Pancione, M. et al. Systems biology analysis of gene expression data and gene network reverse-engineering approaches reveal NFAT5 as a candidate biomarker in Inflammatory Breast Cancer. j. immunotherapy cancer 3 (Suppl 1), P6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-3-S1-P6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-3-S1-P6

Keywords