Characterization of the human T cell response to in vitro CD27 costimulation with varlilumab
© Ramakrishna et al. 2015
Received: 17 March 2015
Accepted: 3 July 2015
Published: 18 August 2015
Clinical targeting of TNFR family of receptors (CD40, CD134 and CD137) with immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies has been successful in cancer immunotherapy. However, targeting of CD27 with a mAb is a relatively new approach to provide costimulation of immune cells undergoing activation. Thus, activation of human CD27 (TNFRSF7) with a monoclonal antibody (varlilumab) has previously been demonstrated to result in T cell activation and anti-tumor activity in preclinical models, and is currently in early phase clinical trials in patients with advanced malignancies. In this study we used an in vitro system using human peripheral blood T cells to characterize the varlilumab-mediated costimulatory effects in combination with TCR stimulation in terms of phenotypic, transcriptional and functionality changes.
T cells were isolated from normal volunteer PBMCs using magnetic bead isolation kits and stimulated in vitro with plate bound anti-CD3 Ab (OKT3) and varlilumab or control Ab for 72 h. Activation profiles were monitored by ELISA or Luminex-based testing cytokine/chemokine releases, cell surface phenotyping for costimulatory and coinhibitory markers and CFSE dye dilution by proliferating T cells and Tregs. Changes in gene expression and transcriptome analysis of varlilumab-stimulated T cells was carried on Agilent Human whole genome microarray datasets using a suite of statistical and bioinformatic software tools.
Costimulation of T cells with varlilumab required continuous TCR signaling as pre-activated T cells were unable to produce cytokines with CD27 signaling alone. Analysis of T cell subsets further revealed that memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were specifically activated with a bias toward CD8+ T lymphocyte proliferation. Activation was accompanied by upregulated cell surface expression of costimulatory [4-1BB, OX40, GITR and ICOS] and coinhibitory [PD-1] molecules. Importantly, varlilumab costimulation did not activate purified Tregs as measured by cytokine production, proliferation and suppression of dividing non-Treg T cells. Analysis of changes in gene expression during varlilumab stimulation of T cells revealed modulation of pro-inflammatory signatures consistent with cellular activation and proliferation, with the IL-2 pathway showing the highest frequency of gene modulation.
Altogether, the data reveal the requirements and T cell subtype-specific effects of CD27 costimulation, and helps select relevant biomarkers for studying the effects of varlilumab in patients.
KeywordsCostimulation CD27 Immunotherapy T cells Monoclonal antibody
CD27, a member of the TNFR superfamily (TNFRSF7), is constitutively expressed as a costimulatory molecule on naïve, activated and memory T cells, NK and NKT cells, Treg and B lymphocytes. Its expression increases upon T cell activation, and is lost at the fully differentiated effector phase . The ligand (CD70, CD27L) is only transiently expressed in matured DCs and activated T and B cells [2–4]. The CD27-CD70 axis appears to be important in cell survival, maintenance of memory cell function, anti-tumor cellular immunity and autoimmunity [5–9]. Consistent with its role in T cell activation and proliferation, CD27 costimulation improves the function of T cells genetically engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) . In humans, the role of CD27 signaling in T cells is complex as it is unclear whether the different lymphocyte subsets that express this molecule are under the control of different transcription factors or in a state of activation or differentiation.
Stimulatory and inhibitory signals are used to control the threshold of T cell activation, survival, cytokine-producing capacity and differentiation in a context dependent manner . A number of the costimulatory molecules are members of the TNFSF/TNFRSF that currently consist of 19 ligands and 29 receptors expressed by non-lymphoid and lymphoid cells . T cells can only translate signals through TNFRSFs in a TCR-dependent manner to support costimulation, coinhibition, proliferation, survival, cytolysis, polarization, expansion of memory effectors and death [13, 14]. Utilizing agonist mAbs to target select TNFR members has proven an effective treatment modality in preclinical cancer models [15–18], which has led to translational clinical studies of agonist mAbs specific for CD40, CD137, and OX40 [19–21].
Although the CD27 pathway has been studied less in this context, a number of studies support that this TNFR member may also be exploited for cancer immunotherapy. Forced expression of CD70 in a transgenic mouse model provides protection against an otherwise lethal challenge of tumor cells by constitutive activation of the CD27 pathway . Furthermore, agonist mAbs specific for mouse CD27 have shown efficacy against syngeneic tumors [23, 24]. The anti-tumor activity of these anti-CD27 mAbs was shown to require IFN-γ and is associated with an increase in effector cells in the tumor .
We have previously described the development and characterization of an agonist fully human anti-CD27 mAb, varlilumab (also known by 1F5 or CDX-1127) [26, 27]. However, very little is known about a direct costimulatory function of human T cells with the use of varlilumab. In this study we examine in more detail the conditions of CD27 costimulation of in vitro activated human T cells by varlilumab and show that the two signals of activation must be presented concurrently to support a regulatory role for this agonist anti-CD27 mAb that shapes transcriptional and translational changes manifested as gene expression, pathway activation and biological function. These findings may have direct application to understanding the effects of varlilumab in treated patients, and may clarify its effects as distinct from the larger group of costimulatory mAbs in development for activating immune responses against cancer.
Fully human anti-CD27 mAb (varlilumab; varli) was produced as previously described [25, 26], commercially available monoclonal anti-human CD3ε (OKT3 clone, eBioscience), ultra-LEAF Abs to 4-1BB, CD28, OX40, GITR, superagonist anti-CD28 (CD28SA clone 28.2) and isotype-matched control murine IgG1s were purchased from BioLegend, control hIgG (fully human IgG1, Celldex) and secondary goat anti-human LEAF Ab for crosslinking were purchased from Southern Biotech (Birmingham, AL). Mouse anti-human Abs to CD27 (M-T271), CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO (all from BD Biosciences); mouse anti-huCD70 blocking Ab (clone BU.69) was purchased from Abcam (UK).
Generation of CD70-293 and mock-293 transfectants
A vector containing the cDNA for human CD70 (accession # NM_001252.2) was purchased from Origene (Rockville, MD). The DNA was digested with EcoRI and NotI to release the fragment containing CD70, which was inserted in the Origene vector pCMV6 (catalogue # pS100009). The correct clone was confirmed by restriction digest analysis and sequencing. FS-293 cells (a variant of HEK 293 cell line) were used for transfections with the pCMV-CD70 (293-CD70) or pCMV-mock vector (293-mock) using the Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) reagents and following the manufacturer’s protocol. At 48 h post transfection, stable transfectants were selected with G418 (0.5 mg/mL). Cell surface CD70 expression was monitored by flow cytometry and high expressing cell lines were selected for experiments.
Primary cell preparations and activation protocols
Freshly prepared buffy coats or whole blood were obtained from normal healthy volunteers from a local blood bank (Biological Specialty Corp., Colmar, PA) and shipped within 2 h of collection in heparinized bags or tubes. PBMCs were isolated by standard density gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-Hypaque (Thermo-Fisher). T cell purification was carried out by cell sorting on magnetic beads by negative selection (Human Pan T cell isolation kit; Human Treg isolation kits (CD4/CD25hi/FoxP3 and CD4/CD25hi/CD127dim) and CD3/CD4 or CD3/CD8 isolation kits; Miltenyi-Biotec, Auburn, CA) and used directly for in vitro stimulations. For stimulation studies, multi-well culture plates were dry-coated with various antibodies or antibody (Ab) combinations. Unless otherwise noted, the concentrations of antibodies used for coating were: OKT3 (1.0 μg/ml), varlilumab (10 μg/ml), control hIgG1 (10 μg/ml), CD28SA (5 μg/ml). Purified T cells (1 × 105 T cells/well) were added to wells of a 96 well plate or 1.5 × 106 cells/well of a 24 well plate) and stimulated with Abs for different durations from 24 to 72 h at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 basal medium supplemented with 10 % heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, L-Glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. Cell-free culture supernatants were obtained by centrifugation and frozen at −20 °C for cytokine and biomarker analysis.
Analysis of cytokine production
Multi-well culture plates were dry-coated with OKT3 (1.0 μg/ml) and either varlilumab (10 μg/ml) or control hIgG (10 μg/ml) prior to addition of T cells isolated from individual donors. Cell culture supernatants were collected from quadruplicate wells and pool tested for cytokines in duplicate (IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα and IL-13) by ELISA using commercial kits (R&D Systems) or with a multiplexed Luminex bead-based assay (41-plex panel, Eve Technologies, Calgary, Canada). Statistical treatment of all cytokine/chemokine results was performed using Student’s two-tailed paired t-test comparing varlilumab costimulation with control stimulation; p values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. The CV of replicate tests was always less than 5 %.
Cell signaling pathway assay
T cells were stimulated for 72 h with OKT3/varlilumab (Varli), OKT3/hIgG, or OKT3/anti-CD28 in the presence or absence of pathway-specific small molecule inhibitors (Invivogen, San Diego, CA). The inhibitors were present for the duration of the experiment. The signaling pathways were blocked with T cells pretreated with NF-κB (Celastrol; 5 μM), MAPKK/ ERK1/2 (PD98059; 50 μM), PKR (2-Aminopurine; 5 μM), MAPK p38 (SB203580 10 μM), IκBα (BAY11-7082; 5 μM) and JAK2 (AG490; 50 μM). Supernatants were harvested from quadruplicate wells and pooled for analysis of IFNγ production by standard ELISA. All samples were run in duplicates with CV <5 %.
Gene expression analysis
T cells (1.5 × 106/well in 24 well plate) were stimulated in vitro separately with two different protocols: Set 1 (3 donors) was 72 h of continuous costimulation (varlilumab/OKT3), while Set 2 (4 donors) was 46 h of pre-activation with OKT3 followed by 4 h of costimulation (varlilumab and OKT3 or isotype control and OKT3). After stimulation, cell pellets were snap frozen and processed for RNA extraction (Miltenyi RNA Isolation Kit), QA/QC testing, and hybridization on Agilent Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarrays (8 × 60K, Miltenyi-Biotec, Auburn, CA). Raw data were processed by FiosGenomics (Edinburgh, UK). The data sets were background-corrected and normalized using quantile normalization  from the green channel. Statistical analysis was performed between the treatment groups (varlilumab/OKT3 versus human IgG1/OKT3) within each set using hypothesis testing based on empirical Bayes  and correcting for false discovery rates using the Benjamini-Hochberg method . A congruence analysis was performed between Set 1 and Set 2 to evaluate any overlap between the two experiments. The evaluation of congruence was performed at both the probe (gene) level as well as the pathway (Gene Ontology/KEGG) level. Differentially expressed genes were called at an adjusted p-value <0.05. Heatmaps were generated by calculating the log2 expression mean for each gene and subtracting that from the iso and test data to yield a scale ranging from −2 to +2 or another scale representing actual fold changes unless otherwise noted. Genes were sorted according to log2 fold changes. Heatmaps were created using the MultiExperiment Viewer software (MeV) available in the TM4 Microarray Software Suite .
NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO): microarray data generated in this study are available in the link:
Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS)
ICS was used to define T cell subtypes involved in the cytokine response to varlilumab costimulation. For these studies, CD3+ T cells were preactivated with OKT3 for 46 h followed by 4 h of costimulation (varlilumab/OKT3). The Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) was used for ICS. Cells were treated with Brefeldin A (GolgiPlug™) for 4 h, and cytokines were stained with anti-IFNγ mAb after permeabilization. The cell surface markers CD3, CD4, CD8, CD69 and CD45RO were used to define T cell subsets by staining with specific antibodies (BD Biosciences) prior to analysis on a FACSCanto II instrument.
T cell proliferation assay
T cells (1 × 106/ml) were labeled with 0.5 μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) while rotating for 5 min. T cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were plated onto 96-well plates previously coated with varlilumab or hIgG1 (2 μg/well) plus OKT3 (50 ng/well). Cells were then collected after 3 or 7 days incubation and stained with various surface markers and analyzed by flow cytometry. The fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (BD Biosciences) were used to stain for cell surface CD8, CD4, 4-1BB, OX40, PD-1, ICOS, CD27 and CTLA-4. For Treg analysis purified CD4 cells were cultured with dry-coated antibodies as described and were fixed and detected using a Treg FoxP3-based phenotyping kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (eBiosciences) and analyzed on a FACSCanto II instrument.
Properties of varlilumab costimulation of T cells
We investigated the kinetics of costimulation for cytokine production under these conditions, and found that 72 h was required to observe a high response to costimulation, and that these kinetics were similar for each cytokine analyzed (Fig. 1b). As shown with a representative donor, varlilumab treatment elicited significant levels of the Th1 cytokines; IFNγ, IL-2, TNFα but also high levels of the Th2 cytokine IL-13 from stimulated cells in a time-dependent and specific manner as shown with the isotype control Ab. To more fully characterize the cytokine response under these conditions, cell culture supernatants were subjected to a cytokine/chemokine analyses on a multiplex platform. The results show a marked increase of Th1-like/inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, some increases in Th2 cytokines (predominantly IL-13 and IL-5) as well as induction of several growth factors such as GM-CSF and CD40L (see Additional file 1: A-C).
We did not initially expect the combined secretion of IL-13 with the Th1 cytokines, and therefore investigated whether a similar pattern would result from CD27 costimulation of TCR-triggered T cells with its cognate ligand, CD70. For these studies, T cells were cultured with irradiated CD70-expressing or mock-transfected cells in wells containing plate-bound OKT3. As shown, similar to stimulation with varlilumab, T cell interaction with CD70-293 cells but not mock-293 cells resulted in release of high levels of IL-13 and IFNγ (Fig. 1c; p < 0.05). Specificity of this response was further shown by blocking the response (in 2 out of 3 donors; p = 0.2) with an anti-CD70 mIgG (BU.69) but not with an isotype-matched control IgG.
We next addressed the question whether coincident TCR signaling is critical for CD27-mediated costimulation, or would pre-activated T cells be primed to respond to varlilumab even in the absence of TCR signaling. T cells were pre-activated by initial stimulation for 46 h with OKT3 mAb alone and then transferred to wells coated either with varlilumab or hIgG with or without OKT3 mAb. In this format, T cell activation was more rapid with high levels of IFNγ released within 24 h (Fig. 1d). However, T cell activation still required both TCR and CD27 signaling together, since the pre-activated T cells could not be further stimulated with varlilumab alone, emphasizing the requirement of concomitant TCR signaling at the time of CD27 costimulation (n = 4; p = 0.09). Moreover, replacing TCR signaling (OKT3) with CD28 stimulation or IL-2 did not result in measurable costimulation with varlilumab (data not shown) further demonstrating that complete activation of T cells with varlilumab only ensues with continuous TCR-triggering.
We also explored the effects of various signaling pathway inhibitors on CD27 costimulation of T cells and how they compared to CD28 costimulation using anti-CD28 super agonistic mAb, CD28SA. As shown in Fig. 1e lack of or reduction in IFNγ release by stimulated T cells in the presence of inhibitors revealed that CD27 costimulation is coupled to 4 of 6 pathways tested (NFκB, ERK1/2, PKR and IκBα signaling) thus resembling pathways initiated by CD28 costimulation. In contrast, however, TCR-triggered pathways utilizing p38MAPkinase and JAK2 were less well intercepted with inhibitors suggesting that these nodes are either not playing a critical role or require participation of auxiliary nodes. CD28 costimulation was distinct from that provided by CD27 in that CD28 only showed a partial involvement of ERK1/2. These observations are consistent with the expected pathways involved in co-stimulation with TNFRSF members and show that T cells may utilize canonical or non-canonical NFκB signaling pathways depending on which costimulatory molecules are engaged.
Molecular footprinting of gene expression changes in CD27 stimulated T cells
KEGG pathways unique to set 1
Bacterial invasion of epithelial cells
PPAR signaling pathway
Mucin type O-Glycan biosynthesis
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Staphylococcus aureus infection
Type I diabetes mellitus
Circadian rhythm - mammal
Hematopoietic cell lineage
Antigen processing and presentation
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)
Chemokine signaling pathway
KEGG pathways unique to set 2
Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis)
Type I diabetes mellitus
Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway
Hematopoietic cell lineage
Butirosin and neomycin biosynthesis
TGF-beta signaling pathway
KEGG pathways overlapping set 1 and set 2
Autoimmune thyroid disease
Intestinal immune network for IgA production
T cell receptor signaling pathway
Jak-STAT signaling pathway
Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction
IL-2 pathway genes modulated by Varlilumab stimulation of T cells
Induced pathway genes
Interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein
Adducin 2 (beta)
Catenin (cadherin-associated protein) alpha 1
Telomerase reverse transcriptase
Leukocyte-associated Ig-like receptor 2
v-myc Myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian)
Leukemia inhibitory factor
Dual specificity phosphatase 6
Colony stimulating factor 2 (granulocyte-macrophage)
Immediate early response 3
Colony stimulating factor 1 (macrophage)
Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1
Nuclear factor, interleukin 3 regulated
Granzyme B (granzyme 2, CTL-associated serine esterase 1
Chemokine (C motif) ligand 1
Interleukin 6 (interferon beta 2)
Protease serine 23
Pleckstrin homology-like domain, family B, member 2
Repressed pathway genes
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 5
v-myc Myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian)
Amyloid beta (A4) precursor protein
CD27 costimulation supports proliferation and cytokine production from specific T cell subsets
The TNFR superfamily of proteins has gained considerable attention in the last decade with a surge in development of immunomodulatory biologics to treat cancer, infectious diseases and autoimmunity. Targeting signaling molecules to enhance anti-cancer immunity has focused on two approaches: (a) activating costimulatory molecules with agonistic Abs directed to T cell surface molecules- CD27, CD40, OX40 and CD137; or (b) blockade of inhibitory pathways with monoclonal Abs directed to cell surface CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, TIM-3, BTLA and LAG-3 . From a clinical perspective, more progress has been achieved with blockade of inhibitory pathways than with the agonist mAbs. This is at least partially due to the fundamental safety challenges of triggering potent costimulatory pathways, which was exemplified by the experience using an anti-CD28 mAb , and dose-limiting toxicities for the development of mAbs to CD40 and CD137 have also been reported [19, 20]. To implement effective costimulatory strategies in the clinic, further characterization and understanding of these agents and their effects is required.
In the case of CD27, the development of mAbs with costimulatory activity is further complicated by data that support the potential anticancer effects of antagonizing this pathway. For example, overexpression of CD70 by tumor cells has been shown to promote T cell dysfunction or apoptosis through CD27 signaling in vitro [34, 35]. However, this effect was overridden by the immune activating properties of CD27 signaling when tested in tumor models . In addition, CD27 signaling in Treg (discussed further below) has been implicated as a means of tumor escape , further emphasizing the need to fully characterize the functional activity of CD27 agonist mAbs. In this study we sought to better characterize the costimulatory properties of varlilumab, the first anti-CD27 mAb to enter clinical trials for treatment of lymphomas and solid tumors. Our analysis was mainly conducted on T cells isolated from healthy individuals, cultured under controlled conditions, and demonstrated a robust activation when varlilumab is combined with TCR stimulation. This study did not analyze other CD27-expressing immune cells such as NK or B cell subsets. The majority of circulating NK cells does not express significant levels of CD27, and our preliminary results suggest that varlilumab does not have a significant effect on circulating B cells (data not shown).
Initially, we compared varlilumab to commercially available Abs to 4-1-BB, GITR and OX40 in the ability to elicit IFNγ production under one standardized condition. Thus, T cell CD27 costimulation with varlilumab was comparable to anti-4-1BB, anti-OX40 costimulations but to a lesser extent with anti-GITR Abs. This study was not meant as a comprehensive comparison of these related costimulatory molecules, but rather as a demonstration that the conditions used in our study are relevant to other related TNFRSF members. Important to the mechanism and safety of varlilumab, we show that TCR triggering must be provided simultaneously with CD27 activation, even in pre-activated T cells in order to result in effective stimulation as measured by cytokine secretion.
The cytokine response to varlilumab costimulated T cells was characterized to include high levels of Th1 cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα, and IL-2), and also significant induction of some Th2 cytokines, dominated by IL-13. This pattern was not unique to costimulation of CD27 with varlilumab, as we observed similar IFNγ and IL-13 secretion from T cells activated with the CD27 ligand, CD70. A similar pattern of Th1 cytokines and IL-13 secretion has been reported for a CD137 agonist mAb, and thus may represent a general feature of TNFR costimulation. In this study IL-13 secretion has been thought to provide a feedback mechanism to dampen excessive inflammation .
To understand whether CD27 downstream events of cytokine production were dependent on canonical or alternate NFkB signaling, T cells were stimulated in the presence of pathway–specific inhibitors. These experiments revealed that IFNγ production was compromised in the presence of JAK2, ERK1/2 and PKR signaling inhibitors which somewhat overlapped with CD28 signaling and consistent with previous reports on CD27 signaling pathways [39, 40]. We also explored the changes in gene expression and signaling pathways following CD27 costimulation. Significant regulation of other TNFRSF members, cytokines and other immune related markers was observed, and genes in the IL-2 signaling pathway were most significantly affected consistent with studies previously reported by Peperzak et al. . While the microarray technology allows for a rapid high throughput and high content analysis of gene expression in in vitro stimulated cells it only provides a snapshot of subtle/marked changes in transcriptional levels of genes and targets implicated in functional cell signaling pathways. The information obtained must therefore be interpreted with caution as it is not uncommon to find a lack of correspondence between transcriptional events and protein expression.
To gain insight into specific populations of T cells responding to CD27 costimulation, we used flow cytometry to measure proliferation and cytokine production coupled with T cell markers. Varlilumab costimulation induced potent proliferation of both CD8+ and CD8- T cells, but its effect was greatest on the CD8+ T cells. This appears to be due to the responsiveness of both CD45RO+ and CD45RO- subsets of CD8 T cells, while only those CD4 T cells with the memory phenotype were stimulated under these conditions. The observed differences were not likely due to differential CD27 surface expression among T subsets since we observed lowest basal CD27 expression on the CD45RO+ cells (see Additional file 3). However, other factors such as the intrinsic capacity of these cell populations to become activated in vitro and the variable expression of inhibitory receptors may also account for the observed differential proliferative capacity of CD8s versus CD4s. The fate of cells activated by anti-CD3 and a costimulatory molecule often is accompanied by upregulation of accessory molecules that either amplify or dampen the existing response. Interestingly, we have observed extended coexpression of 4-1BB, GITR, OX40, ICOS, CTLA-4 and PD-1 believed to be associated with CD27 triggering in presence of TCR triggering. The discordance of some of these changes with the gene expression data is unclear at present but suggest a more complex network of genes being co-regulated that could affect kinetics of biomarker availability on the cell surface.
CD27 is expressed constitutively on human Tregs  and CD27 co-stimulation in the thymus rescues developing Treg cells from apoptosis and thereby promotes Treg generation . CD27 signaling has also been implicated in Treg expansion in mice] where increased numbers of Tregs in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, spleens and nodes were reported in CD27(+/+) wild type mice relative to CD27(−/−) mice suggesting that CD27-CD70 signaling increases the number of Tregs . Because a comparison of mice completely lacking CD27 compared to those simply expressing CD27 is not necessarily representative of the effects of a particular agonist anti-CD27 mAb, we therefore explored the effect of varlilumab costimulation on proliferation and cytokine production on purified Treg cells. We showed that cytokine induction and stimulation of proliferation by varlilumab were much lower for Tregs than for conventional T cells, and much lower than that induced by anti-CD28 as well. This suggests that CD27 and CD28 may follow divergent pathways in Treg stimulation and is consistent with other reports on Treg costimulation requirements [44, 45]. Our in vitro results using human T cells are consistent with mouse tumor model studies in which an agonist anti-mouse CD27 mAb (AT124-1) reduced the numbers of FoxP3-expressing cells within tumors but had no effect on the suppressor activity on a per cell basis . Our in vitro results are also consistent with our early clinical results  in which treatment with varlilumab leads to a significant and roughly 50 % reduction in Tregs in the peripheral circulation. While this does not preclude the potential benefit of antagonizing the CD27 pathway as has been proposed by others , the cumulative data with our agonist mAb, varlilumab, does not support the occurrence of unwanted Treg activation.
Altogether, this study documents the requirements, kinetics and breadth of the in vitro T cell activation signature with varlilumab costimulation through CD27. Consistent with earlier studies, the data demonstrate a tightly regulated response that includes both immune potentiating and immune regulating changes. These molecular and cellular patterns should predict biomarkers that may be impacted in patients treated with varlilumab. Correlations of these markers with the safety and clinical benefit from varlilumab treatment is ongoing and will be important to better understand which features of CD27 costimulation are most relevant to outcomes seen in patients.
Anti-CD3 antibody clone
Anti-CD27 Ab (varlilumab)
Human IgG or Isotype Control Ab
False discovery rate
Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
We thank Jenifer Widger (Celldex Hampton NJ) for preparing the gene constructs (293-CD70 and 293-mock); and Dr. Michael DeSalvo (OneArray; Phalanx Biotech Group) for providing microarray data analysis and additional bioinformatics services.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Hintzen RQ, de Jong R, Lens SM, Brouwer M, Baars P, van Lier RAW. Regulation of CD27 expression on subsets of mature T-lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1993;151:2426–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bowman MR, Crimmins MA, Yetz-Aldape J, Kriz R, Kelleher K, Herrmann S. The cloning of CD70 and its identification as the ligand for CD27. J Immunol. 1994;152:1756–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tesselaar K, Xiao Y, Arens R, van Schijndel GMW, Schuurhuis DH, Mebius RE, et al. Expression of the murine CD27 ligand CD70 in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. 2003;170:33–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hintzen RQ, Lens SM, Beckmann MP, Goodwin RG, Lynch D, van Lier RA. Characterization of the human CD27 ligand, a novel member of the TNF gene family. J Immunol. 1994;152:1762–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hintzen RQ, Lens SM, Lammers K, Kuiper H, Beckmann MP, van Lier RA. Engagement of CD27 with its ligand CD70 provides a second signal for T cell activation. J Immunol. 1995;154:2612–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobata T, Agematsu K, Kameoka J, Schlossman SF, Morimoto C. CD27 is a signal-transducing molecule involved in CD45RA+ naïve T cell costimulation. J Immunol. 1994;153:5422–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks J, Gravestein LA, Tesselaar K, van Lier RAW, Schumacher TNM, Borst J. CD27 is required for generation and long-term maintenance of T cell immunity. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:433–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hendriks J, Xiao Y, Borst J. CD27 promotes survival of activated T cells and complements CD28 in generation and establishment of the effector T cell pool. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1369–80.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Denoeud J, Moser M. Role of CD27/CD70 pathway of activation in immunity and tolerance. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song D-G, Ye Q, Poussin M, Harms GM, Figini M, Powell Jr DJ. CD27 costimulation augments the survival and antitumor activity of redirected human T cells in vivo. Blood. 2012;119(3):696–706.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen L, Flies DB. Molecular mechanisms of T cell costimulation and coinhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:227–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yao S, Zhu Y, Chen L. Advances in targeting cell surface signaling molecules for immune modulation. Nat Rev Drug Disc. 2013;12:130–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Croft M. Costimulation of T cells by OX40, 4-1BB and CD27. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14:265–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kober J, Leitner J, Klauser C, Woitek R, Majdic O, Stockl J, et al. The capacity of the TNF family members 4-1BBL, OX40L, CD70, GITRL, CD30L and LIGHT to costimulate human T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38(10):2678–88.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- French RR, Chan HT, Tutt AL, Glennie MJ. CD40 antibody evokes a cytotoxic T-cell response that eradicates lymphoma and bypasses T-cell help. Nat Med. 1999;5:548–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melero I, Shuford WW, Newby SA, Aruffo A, Ledbetter JA, Hellström KE, et al. Monoclonal antibodies against the 4-1BB T-cell activation molecule eradicate established tumors. Nat Med. 1997;3:682–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jensen SM, Maston LD, Gough MJ, Ruby CE, Redmond WL, Crittenden M, et al. Signaling through OX40 enhances antitumor immunity. Semin Oncol. 2010;37(5):524–32.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cohen AD, Schaer DA, Liu C, Li Y, Hirschhorn-Cymmerman D, Kim SC, et al. Agonist anti-GITR monoclonal antibody induces melanoma tumor immunity in mice by altering regulatory T cell stability and intra-tumor accumulation. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10436. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010436.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vonderheide RH, Glennie MJ. Agonistic CD40 antibodies and cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1035–43.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yonezawa A, Dutt S, Chester C, Kim J, Kohrt HE. Boosting cancer immunotherapy with anti-CD137 antibody therapy. Clin Can Res. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
- Curti BD, Kovacsovics-Bankowski M, Morris N, Walker E, Chisholm L, Floyd K, et al. OX40 is a potent immune-stimulating target in late-stage cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2013;73:7189–98.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arens R, Schepers K, Nolte MA, van Osterwijk ME, van Lier RAW, Schumaker TNM, et al. Tumor rejection induced by CD70-mediated quantitative and qualitative effects on effector CD8+ T cell formation. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1595–605.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- French RR, Taraban VY, Crowther GR, Rowley TF, Gray JC, Johnson PW, et al. Eradication of lymphoma by CD8 T cells following anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody therapy is critically dependent on CD27 costimulation. Blood. 2007;109:4810–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakanishi T, Yagita H. Anti-tumor effects of depleting and non-depleting anti-CD27 monoclonal antibodies in immune-competent mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;393:829–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roberts DJ, Franklin NA, Kingeter LM, Yagita H, Tutt AL, Glennie MJ, et al. Control of established melanoma by CD27 stimulation is associated with enhanced effector function and persistence, and reduced PD-1 expression of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells. J Immunother. 2010;33:769–79.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vitale L, He L-Z, Thomas LJ, Widger J, Weidlick J, Crocker A, et al. Development of a human monoclonal antibody for potential therapy of CD27-expressing lymphoma and leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(14):3812–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He L-Z, Prostak N, Thomas LJ, Vitale L, Weidlick J, Crocker A, et al. Agonist anti-human CD27 monoclonal antibody induces T cell activation and tumor immunity in human CD27-transgenic mice. J Immunol. 2013;191:4174–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array based on bias and variance. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:185–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article 3.Google Scholar
- Benjaminin Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.Google Scholar
- Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques. 2003;34(2):374–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature. 2011;480:480–89.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suntharalingham G, Perry MR, Ward S, Brett SJ, Castello-Cortes A, Brunner MD, et al. Cytokine storm in a phase I trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1018–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wischhusen J, Jung G, Radovanovic I, Beier C, Steinbach JP, Rimner A, et al. Identification of CD70-mediated apoptosis of immune effector cells as a novel immune escape pathway of human glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2592–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chahlavi A, Rayman P, Richmond AL, Biswas K, Zhang R, Vogelbaum M, et al. Glioblastomas induce T-lymphocyte death by two distinct pathways involving gangliosides and CD70. Cancer Res. 2005;65:5428–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aulwurm S, Wischhusen J, Friese M, Borst J, Weller M. Immune stimulatory effects of CD70 override CD70-mediated immune cell apoptosis in rodent glioma models and confer long-lasting antiglioma immunity in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(7):1728–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Claus C, Reither C, Schurch C, Matter MS, Hilmenyuk T, Ochsenbein AF. CD27 signaling increases the frequency of regulatory T cells and promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2012;72(14):3364–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin SM, Kim YH, Choi BK, Kwon PM, Lee H-W, Kwon BS. 4-1BB triggers IL-13 production from T cells to limit the polarized, Th1-mediated inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81:1455–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto H, Kishimoto T, Minamoto S. NF-κB activation in CD27 signaling: Involvement of TNF receptor-associated factors in its signaling and identification of functional region of CD27. J Immunol. 1998;161:4753–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dumont FJ, Staruch MJ, Fischer P, DaSilva C, Camacho R. Inhibition of T cell activation by pharmacologic disruption of the MEK/ERK MAP kinase or calcineurin signaling pathways results in differential modulation of cytokine production. J Immunol. 1998;160:2579–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peperzak V, Xiao Y, Veraar EAM, Borst J. CD27 sustains survival of CTLs in vrus-infected nonlymphoid tissue in mice by inducing autocrine IL-2 production. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:168–78.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duggleby RC, Shawn TN, Jarvis LB, Kaur G, Gaston JS. CD27 expression discriminates between regulatory and non-regulatory cells after expansion of human peripheral blood CD4+CD25+ cells. Immunology. 2007;121:129–39.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coquet JM, Ribot JC, Babala N, Middendorp S, van der Horst G, Xiao Y, et al. Epithelial and dendritic cells in the thymic medulla promote CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cell development via CD27-CD70 pathway. J Exp Med. 2013;210:715–28.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakamatsu E, Mathis D, Benoist C. Convergent and divergent effects of costimulatory molecules in conventional and regulatory CD4+ T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(3):1023–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Golovina TN, Mikheeva T, Suhoski MM, Aqui NA, Tai VC, Shan X, et al. CD28 costimulation is essential for human T regulatory expansion and function. J Immunol. 2008;18:2855–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bullock T, McClintic H, Jeong S, Smith K, Olson W, Ramakrishna V, et al. Immune correlates of Varlilumab treated cancer patients are consistent with CD27 costimulatory activity. J ImmunotherCancer. 2014;2 Suppl 3:100.
- Riether C, Schürch C, Ochsenbein AF. Modulating CD27 signaling to treat cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1604–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar