Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Fig. 1

From: Radiation and PD-(L)1 treatment combinations: immune response and dose optimization via a predictive systems model

Fig. 1

a Structural elements and interactions captured in the IO QSP model. Abbreviations used: TCD: tumor cell death rate function; DC m : level of mature DCs; IAR: immune activation rate; Ag sys : systemic level of tumor antigen; PD-L1, PD-L1 immuno-suppressive component; ISC: immuno-suppression cells; nT eff : non-differentiated T cells; dT eff : cytotoxic effector T cells; IAR, immune activation rate; DSB: double-strand breaks; TV tot  = TV + TV d , where TV and TV d are volumes of, respectively, proliferating cells and radiation-damaged non-proliferating tumor cells. b Distributions of population model predictions and corresponding tumor dynamics data. Black arrows: RT administration (fractionated dose of 5 × 2 Gy); blue arrows: anti-PD-L1 mAB administration (3qw for 3 weeks). Values on plots indicate number of complete tumor rejections and number of animals in the experiment. Experimental data are taken from Dovedi et al., 2014. [12]

Back to article page