Trial | Description | Results (combination vs. SOC), 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OS | PFS (months) | Objective Response | ||
CheckMate 025 (NCT01668784) [16] | Nivolumab vs. Everolimus | PD-L1 τ (< 1%) a mOS: 27.4 vs. 21.2 mo (HR 0.77; 0.60 to 0.97) PD-L1 τ (≥1%) a mOS: 21.8 vs. 18.8 mo (HR 0.79; 0.53 to 1.17 |  |  |
CheckMate 214 (NCT02231749) [9] | Nivolumab + Ipilimumab vs. Sunitinib | PD-L1 τ (< 1%) a HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96 12-mo rate: 80% vs. 75% 18-mo rate; 74% vs. 64% PD-L1 τ (≥1%) a HR 0.45; 0.29 to 0.71 12-mo rate: 86% vs. 66% 18-mo rate: 81% vs. 53% Sarcomatoid Histology HR 0.56; 0.38–0.83 PD-L1 (≥1%) prevalence: 50% (SH) vs. 27.5% (non-SH) | PD-L1 τ (< 1%) a mPFS: 11.0 vs. 10.4 (HR 1.00; 0.8 to 1.26) PD-L1 τ (≥1%) a mPFS: 22.8 vs. 5.9 (HR 0.46; 0.31 to 0.67) | PD-L1 τ (< 1%) a ORR: 37% vs. 28%, p = 0.03 PD-L1 τ (≥1%) a ORR: 58% vs. 22%, p < 0.001 Sarcomatoid Histology ORR: 56.7% vs. 19.2%, P < .0001 CR: 18.3% vs. 0% |
Keynote-426 (NCT02853331) [11] [insert ASCO abstract 4500] | Pembrolizumab + Axitinib vs. Sunitinib | PD-L1 β (< 1%) b HR 0.59; 0.34 to 1.03 PD-L1 β (≥1%) b HR 0.54; 0.35 to 0.84 Sarcomatoid Histology 12-mo OS: 83.4% vs 79.5% (HR 0.58; 0.21 to 1.59) | PD-L1 β (< 1%) b HR 0.87; 0.62 to 1.23 PD-L1 β (≥1%) b HR 0.62; 0.47 to 0.80 Sarcomatoid Histology mPFS: NR vs. 8.4 (HR 0.54; 0.29 to 1.00) | Sarcomatoid Histology ORR: 58.8% vs 31.5% CR: 11.8% vs. 0% |
Javelin RENAL 101 (NCT02684006) | Avelumab + Axitinib vs. Sunitinib | Not available. | PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) c mPFS: 13.8 vs 7.2 (HR 0.61; 0.47 to 0.79; P < 0.001) PD-L1¥- (< 1%) c mPFS: 16.1 vs. 11.1 | PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) c ORR: 55.2% vs 25.5% CR: 4.4% vs. 2.1% PD-L1¥- (< 1%) c ORR: 47% vs. 28% |
IMmotion150 [46] | Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab or Atezolizumab monotherapy vs. Sunitinib | Not available. | ITT Population Combination HR 1.0; 0.69 to 1.45 Monotherapy HR 1.19; 0.82 to 1.71 PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) d Combination HR 0.64; 0.38 to 1.08 Monotherapy HR 1.03; 0.63 to 1.67 | PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) d 48% (combination) and 28% (monotherapy) vs. 27% |
IMmotion151 (NCT02420821) [14] [insert ASCO abstract citation] | Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab vs. Sunitinib | PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) d OS: 75% vs. 65% (HR 0.68; 0.46–1.0; p = 0.0470) Sarcomatoid Histology All Sarc mOS: NR vs. 15.0 (HR: 0.56; 0.32 to 0.96) 12-mo OS: 69% vs. 60% PD-L1+ Sarc mOS: NR vs. 15.0 (HR: 0.53; 0.27 to 1.06) 12-mo OS: 71% vs. 61% | PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) d mPFS: 11.2 vs. 7.7 (HR 0.74; 0.57 to 0.96; p = 0.0217) Sarcomatoid Histology All Sarc mPFS: 8.3 vs. 5.3 (HR: 0.52; 0.34 to 0.79) PD-L1+ Sarc mOS: 8.6 vs. 5.6 (HR: 0.45; 0.26 to 0.77) Gene Expression Signatures High Teff mPFS: 12.45 vs. 8.34 (HR 0.76; 0.59–0.99) Low Teff mPFS: 9.72 vs. 8.41 m High angiogenesis mPFS: 12.45 vs. 10.2 (HR 0.95; 0.75–1.19) Low angiogenesis mPFS: 8.94 vs. 5.95 (HR 0.68; 0.52–0.89) | PD-L1¥ + (≥1%) d ORR: 43% vs 35% Sarcomatoid Histology All Sarc ORR: 49% vs. 14% CR: 10 vs. 3% PD-L1+ Sarc ORR: 56% vs. 12% CR: 14% vs. 4% |