Skip to main content


You are viewing the new article page. Let us know what you think. Return to old version

Poster presentation | Open | Published:

A Phase I/III, multicenter, open-label trial of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in combination with pembrolizumab for the treatment of unresected, stage IIIb-IV melanoma (MASTERKEY-265)


T-VEC is a herpes simplex virus-1-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to selectively replicate in tumors, produce GM-CSF, and stimulate antitumor immune responses. OPTiM, a Phase III trial of T-VEC vs GM-CSF in unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma, improved the primary endpoint of durable response rate (DRR) in the T-VEC arm (16 vs 2%).[1] Pembrolizumab, a human programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved for the treatment of advanced metastatic or unresectable melanoma, has demonstrated superiority over the CTLA-4-blocking antibody ipilimumab in patients with stage III or IV melanoma that received no more than one prior line of systemic therapy (PFS HR 0.58, OS HR 0.63-0.69).[2] Combining T-VEC with pembrolizumab may enhance antitumor immune responses vs either therapy alone. Here, we describe a Phase Ib/III study assessing the safety and efficacy of T-VEC + pembrolizumab in unresected stage IIIB-IV melanoma. Twenty-one patients enrolled in Phase Ib December 2014 through March 2015 at 11 institutions in Australia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States.


Primary objective for Phase Ib: assess dose-limiting toxicities of T-VEC + pembrolizumab. Key secondary objectives for Phase Ib: best OR, DRR, duration of response, disease control rate, PFS by investigator using modified immune-related response criteria (irRC), OS, treatment-emergent/related AEs, and potential blood/tumor biomarkers for response/resistance to combination treatment. Key eligibility criteria for Phase Ib: stage IIIB-IV melanoma naïve to systemic treatment (except adjuvant), injectable lesions, ECOG PS 0-1, no active cerebral metastases, no autoimmunity/immunosuppression, and no active herpetic infection. In Phase Ib, T-VEC is injected into cutaneous, subcutaneous, or nodal lesions at up to 4 mL of 106 plaque forming units (PFU)/mL day 1, then at up to 4 mL of 108 PFU/mL day 22 and Q2W. Pembrolizumab is given 200 mg IV Q2W. Treatment with both therapies continues until (whichever comes first): CR or PD per irRC, intolerance, for up to 2 yrs or, for T-VEC, when there are no longer injectable lesions. The randomized portion of the study comparing T-VEC + pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone was originally designed as a Phase II study. An updated Phase III design will be presented.

Trial registration identifier NCT02263508.


  1. 1.

    Andtbacka RH, Kaufman HL, Collichio F, et al: Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015, doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3377 [epub ahead of print]

  2. 2.

    Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al: Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015, 372: 2521-2532.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Georgina V Long.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark


  • Melanoma
  • Herpes Simplex
  • Ipilimumab
  • Antitumor Immune Response
  • Plaque Form Unit