Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Research article
Open Access

Inhibition of arginase by CB-1158 blocks myeloid cell-mediated immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment

  • Susanne M. Steggerda1Email author,
  • Mark K. Bennett1,
  • Jason Chen1,
  • Ethan Emberley1,
  • Tony Huang1,
  • Julie R. Janes1,
  • Weiqun Li1,
  • Andrew L. MacKinnon1,
  • Amani Makkouk1,
  • Gisele Marguier1,
  • Peter J. Murray2, 3,
  • Silinda Neou1,
  • Alison Pan1,
  • Francesco Parlati1,
  • Mirna L. M. Rodriguez1,
  • Lee-Ann Van de Velde3,
  • Tracy Wang1,
  • Melissa Works1,
  • Jing Zhang1,
  • Winter Zhang1 and
  • Matthew I. Gross1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer20175:101

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0308-4

©  The Author(s). 2017

Received: 21 September 2017

Accepted: 30 November 2017

Published: 19 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Myeloid cells are an abundant leukocyte in many types of tumors and contribute to immune evasion. Expression of the enzyme arginase 1 (Arg1) is a defining feature of immunosuppressive myeloid cells and leads to depletion of L-arginine, a nutrient required for T cell and natural killer (NK) cell proliferation. Here we use CB-1158, a potent and orally-bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of arginase, to investigate the role of Arg1 in regulating anti-tumor immunity.

Methods

CB-1158 was tested for the ability to block myeloid cell-mediated inhibition of T cell proliferation in vitro, and for tumor growth inhibition in syngeneic mouse models of cancer as a single agent and in combination with other therapies. Tumors from animals treated with CB-1158 were profiled for changes in immune cell subsets, expression of immune-related genes, and cytokines. Human tumor tissue microarrays were probed for Arg1 expression by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Cancer patient plasma samples were assessed for Arg1 protein and L-arginine by ELISA and mass spectrometry, respectively.

Results

CB-1158 blocked myeloid cell-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation in vitro and reduced tumor growth in multiple mouse models of cancer, as a single agent and in combination with checkpoint blockade, adoptive T cell therapy, adoptive NK cell therapy, and the chemotherapy agent gemcitabine. Profiling of the tumor microenvironment revealed that CB-1158 increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and NK cells, inflammatory cytokines, and expression of interferon-inducible genes. Patient tumor samples from multiple histologies expressed an abundance of tumor-infiltrating Arg1+ myeloid cells. Plasma samples from cancer patients exhibited elevated Arg1 and reduced L-arginine compared to healthy volunteers.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that Arg1 is a key mediator of immune suppression and that inhibiting Arg1 with CB-1158 shifts the immune landscape toward a pro-inflammatory environment, blunting myeloid cell-mediated immune evasion and reducing tumor growth. Furthermore, our results suggest that arginase blockade by CB-1158 may be an effective therapy in multiple types of cancer and combining CB-1158 with standard-of-care chemotherapy or other immunotherapies may yield improved clinical responses.

Keywords

Arg1Arg2ArginaseArginineCheckpoint blockadeGranulocyteImmunotherapyMyeloid derived suppressor cellTumor associated macrophageTumor microenvironment

Background

Myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are associated with poor prognosis across multiple types of cancer, including lung, colorectal, and breast [1]. Tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells contribute to an immunosuppressive TME through multiple mechanisms, constraining anti-tumor immunity and hindering immunotherapy [2, 3]. Agents that aim to block myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression are currently in pre-clinical and clinical development, however there are no approved therapies specifically directed against tumor-associated myeloid cells [4, 5].

The major populations of tumor infiltrating myeloid cells include tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and granulocytes [2, 6, 7]. A feature common to all of these immunosuppressive cells is their expression of the enzyme arginase 1 (Arg1) [8]. Arg1 catalyzes hydrolysis of the amino acid L-arginine to produce urea and L-ornithine, thereby depleting extracellular L-arginine [9]. T cells are auxotrophic for L-arginine, requiring the amino acid for the rapid and successive rounds of proliferation that follow T cell antigen receptor (TCR)-dependent activation of effector cells [10–12]. In some inflammatory settings, myeloid-mediated arginine depletion is essential for suppressing excessive T cell proliferation [13]. Blocking Arg1 activity in the context of cancer could therefore shift the balance of L-arginine metabolism to favor lymphocyte proliferation. Indeed, in murine studies, injection of the arginase inhibitor nor-NOHA or genetic disruption of Arg1 in the myeloid compartment resulted in reduced tumor growth, indicating that Arg1 is pro-tumorigenic [14, 15]. Thus, pharmacological inhibition of Arg1 is a compelling therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer.

Here we describe CB-1158, a potent and orally-bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of Arg1. In T cell co-cultures, CB-1158 reversed myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression and restored T cell proliferation. In murine syngeneic tumor models, CB-1158 shifted the tumor immune landscape toward a pro-inflammatory TME, resulting in tumor growth inhibition. CB-1158 augmented the efficacy of other anti-cancer agents, including gemcitabine, antibodies to immune checkpoints, adoptive T cell therapy, and adoptive NK cell therapy, to inhibit tumor growth. The therapeutic potential of targeting Arg1 was further supported in a screen of cancer patient samples that revealed an abundance of Arg1-expressing myeloid cells in tumors and high amounts of Arg1 in plasma. CB-1158 is currently in clinical trials for patients with solid tumor malignancies (NCT02903914).

Methods

Chemical compounds

CB-1158 was synthesized at Calithera Biosciences [16] and dissolved in 100% DMSO for biochemical assays or in Milli-Q water (Millipore, Billerica, MA) for cell-based assays and in vivo studies. No endotoxin contamination of CB-1158 preparations was observed. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless indicated otherwise.

Flow cytometry antibodies

The following anti-mouse antibodies were used for flow cytometry: CD45-V450 (30F11), CD45-BV510 (30F11), CD45-BV605 (30F11), CD8-BV510 (53–6.7), CD25-BV421 (PC61), CD25-BV605 (PC61) from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA); CD3-PerCP-eFluor710 (17A2), CD45-PE-Cy7 (30F11), NKp46-eFluor660 (29A1.4), CD11b-PE-Cy7 (M1/70), CD68-PE-Cy7 (FA-11) from eBioscience (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA); CD3-PE (17A2); CD68-BV421 (FA-11), CD206-AlexaFluor488 (C068C2), CD11b-PerCP-Cy5.5 (M1/70), CD11b-BV605 (M1/70) from BioLegend (San Diego, CA); CD11b-PE (M1/70) from Stemcell Technologies (Vancouver, Canada); and Arg1-APC (polyclonal) from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The following anti-human antibodies were used for flow cytometry: CD66b-PE (G10F5), CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5 (SK3), CD8-APC (RPA-T8) from BD Biosciences; and CD15-eF450 (HI98) from eBioscience.

Recombinant arginase activity assays

Recombinant full-length human Arg1 was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY). Recombinant human arginase 2 (Arg2) comprising amino acids 23–254 was purchased from US Biological (Salem, MA). Activity assays using 2 nM Arg1 or 4 nM Arg2 were performed in reaction buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 0.005% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 160 μM or 20 mM L-arginine, pH 7.4) at 37 °C for 30 min with a dose-titration of CB-1158. Activity was determined by a spectrophotometric assay using the QuantiChrom Urea Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA) or by quantification of the generation of 13C(5)-L-ornithine from 13C(6)-L-arginine using a SCIEX API4000 mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Urea produced or 13C(5)-L-ornithine peak areas were plotted and fitted to a four-parameter equation using GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA) to determine IC50 values.

Native arginase activity in cell lysates

Human granulocytes or erythrocytes were purified from healthy donor peripheral blood using a pan-granulocyte negative selection kit (Stemcell Technologies) or centrifugation on a Ficoll layer, respectively. Frozen human hepatocytes were purchased from XenoTech (Kansas City, KS). Lysates were prepared by microtip sonication followed with clarification by centrifugation. Plasma samples from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients were obtained by Ficoll centrifugation of whole blood purchased from Conversant Biologics (Huntsville, AL). Granulocyte lysate was assayed at 0.094 mg/mL, as determined by bicinchoninic acid/BCA protein assay (ThermoFisher), in reaction buffer. Erythrocyte or hepatocyte lysates were assayed at concentrations empirically determined to consume 10–15% of 13C(6)-L-arginine in 30 min at 37 °C. Arginase activity was determined in lysates and plasma by quantification of the generation of 13C(5)-L-ornithine from 13C(6)-L-arginine in the presence of a dose-titration of CB-1158.

Native arginase activity in intact cells

Intracellular arginase activity was determined for the arginase-expressing HepG2 and K-562 cell lines as follows. HepG2 cells were seeded at 100,000 cells per well one day prior to treatment with CB-1158. K-562 cells were seeded at 200,000 cells per well on the day of CB-1158 treatment. Cells were treated with a dose-titration of CB-1158 in SILAC RPMI-1640 media (Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 5% heat-inactivated and dialyzed FBS, antibiotics/anti-mycotic, 10 mM L-arginine, 0.27 mM L-lysine, and 2 mM L-glutamine. The medium was harvested after 24 h and urea generated was determined with the QuantiChrom Urea Assay Kit. Wells containing media without cells were used as background controls. For assessing the effect of CB-1158 on Arg1 in primary hepatocytes, frozen human hepatocytes (XenoTech) were thawed, allowed to adhere onto collagen-coated wells for 4 h, and then incubated for 48 h in SILAC-RPMI containing 10 mM L-ornithine, no L-arginine, and a dose-titration of CB-1158, at which time the media were analyzed for urea.

Nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) activity assays

Activity of 50 μM CB-1158 against 3 NOS isoforms, recombinant murine inducible NOS, recombinant bovine endothelial NOS, and native rat cerebellar neuronal NOS, was determined at Eurofins/Cerep Panlabs (Taipei, Taiwan) by either quantitation of radiolabeled L-citrulline or spectrophotometric measurement of nitrite.

Cell culture

All cell culture reagents were purchased from Corning (Corning, NY) unless indicated otherwise. The human cell lines, HepG2 and K-562, and the murine cell lines, LLC1 (LLC), B16-F10 (B16), CT26.WT (CT26), and 4T1 were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). HepG2, K-562, CT26, and 4T1 were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Corning). B16 was maintained in DMEM (Corning). LLC was maintained in DMEM (ATCC). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), plus penicillin, streptomycin, and amphotericin. Cell lines were grown at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Cytotoxicity assays

Cells were seeded in fully-supplemented RPMI-1640 medium, treated with a dose-titration of CB-1158 in triplicate wells, and incubated for 72 h. Cytotoxicity was assayed by the addition of CellTiterGlo reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI) followed by fluorescence quantification on a Molecular Devices plate reader (Sunnyvale, CA).

T cell and NK cell proliferation assays

T cells or NK cells were purified from healthy donor human blood or from murine splenocytes using a negative selection kit for the appropriate cell type and species from Stemcell Technologies. Isolated T cells or NK cells were loaded with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE, Thermo Fisher) and stimulated for 72–96 h in complete growth medium containing a minimum of either 50 μM L-arginine (NK cells) or 100 μM L-arginine (T cells). For T cell stimulation, a solution of 10 μg/mL anti-CD3 (human clones UCHT1 or OKT3; murine clone 145-2C11) was used to coat the wells of a 96-well plate and then T cells were stimulated on immobilized anti-CD3 in the presence of 2 μg/mL soluble anti-CD28 (human clone CD28.2; murine clone 37.51). NK cells were stimulated with recombinant IL-2. Proliferation was quantified by analyzing CFSE dilution by flow cytometry (Guava flow cytometer, Millipore, Billerica, MA or Attune NxT flow cytometer, ThermoFisher).

T cell/myeloid cell co-culture assays

Granulocytes were purified from healthy donor peripheral blood using a pan-granulocyte negative selection kit (Stemcell Technologies) and incubated in SILAC-RPMI medium containing 10% charcoal-stripped FBS, antibiotics/anti-mycotic, 0.27 mM L-lysine, 20 μM MnCl2, 100 μM L-arginine, pH 7.4, and a dose-titration of CB-1158. Freshly isolated granulocytes were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C, during which time they spontaneously activate as determined by increased surface expression of CD66b and scatter properties. T cells isolated from the same healthy donor using a pan-T cell isolation kit (Stemcell Technologies) were loaded with CFSE and plated with immobilized anti-CD3 and soluble anti-CD28 in the presence of the aged granulocytes. The cells were co-cultured at several ratios of granulocytes to T cells as indicated in the figure or at a fixed ratio of 4 T cells to 1 granulocyte. Co-cultures were incubated for 3–4 days, at which time the medium was analyzed for L-arginine and L-ornithine by mass spectrometry and T cell proliferation was determined by flow cytometry. Granulocytic MDSC (G-MDSC) or granulocytes from cancer patients were isolated from whole blood purchased from Conversant Biologics. G-MDSCs were purified from the PBMC layer of a Ficoll gradient by positive selection for CD66b+ cells. Granulocytes were purified from the RBC layer of a Ficoll gradient using Hetasep (Stemcell Technologies). Granulocytes and G-MDSCs were characterized by flow cytometry for CD66b expression. Freshly isolated G-MDSC or granulocytes were incubated in co-culture medium containing 100 μM L-arginine for 48 h, at which time the cells were removed and the G-MDSC- or granulocyte-conditioned media were used for incubating healthy donor CFSE-loaded T cells on immobilized anti-CD3/soluble anti-CD28 for 3–4 days. Cytokines were quantified in the media from T cell co-culture assays using the Cytometric Bead Array kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences).

Murine tumor studies

Female wild-type C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice (5–6 weeks old) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Hollister, CA). Severe combined immune deficient (SCID, B6.CB17-PrkdcSCID/SzJ) and Pmel-1 TCR transgenic (B6.Cg-Thy1a/Cy Tg(TcraTcrb)8Rest/J) mice (5–6 weeks old) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were housed and treated in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. For the 4T1 tumor model, 105 cells were injected orthotopically into the mammary fat pad; for all other tumor models, 106 cells were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) in the right flank. For all studies, CB-1158 was administered by oral gavage twice per day at 100 mg/kg starting on study day 1 (1 day after tumor implant). Control groups received vehicle (water) twice daily by gavage. Tumor volume measured by digital caliper (length × width × width/2) and body weight were recorded three times per week. Animals were euthanized when tumors necrotized or volumes reached 2000 mm3. For the CT26 model, anti-PD-L1 antibody (5 mg/kg, clone 10F.9G2, BioXCell, West Lebanon, NH) was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) on days 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15. For the 4T1 model, anti-CTLA-4 antibody (5 mg/kg, clone 9H10, BioXCell) was injected i.p. on days 2, 5, and 8; anti-PD-1 antibody (5 mg/kg, clone RMP1–14, BioXCell) was injected i.p. on days 3, 6, and 9. 4T1 tumors were harvested on study day 25 into Fekete’s solution and tumor nodules were enumerated visually. Gemcitabine (Selleckchem, Houston, TX) was dosed 50 mg/kg i.p. on days 10 and 16 for the CT26 model, 60 mg/kg i.p. on days 6 and 10 for the LLC model, or 30 mg/kg i.p. on day 5 for the 4T1 model [17, 18]. With these regimens, gemcitabine modestly reduces tumor growth and spares most tumor-infiltrating immune cells, allowing for the evaluation of combination activity with CB-1158. For CD8+ cell depletion, mice were injected i.p. with anti-CD8 antibody (25 mg/kg, clone 2.43, BioXCell) on days −1, 0, + 5, and +10. For NK cell depletion, mice were injected i.p. with anti-NK1.1 antibody (25 mg/kg, clone PK136, BioXCell) in the LLC and B16 models or with anti-Asialo GM1 sera (20 μL, Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA) in the CT26 model, per the same schedule as anti-CD8.

Conditional Arg1 deleted mice

Arg1 floxed mice were crossed to the Tie2-Cre deleter strain (The Jackson Laboratory) as previously described [19]. Experimental mice were generated from crossing Arg1 Flox/Flox ; Tie2-Cre + males with Arg1 Flox/Flox ; Tie2-Cre − females, with Cre negative littermates serving as wild-type controls. Mice were housed and treated in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. LLC cells (106 per mouse) were injected s.c. in the flank region. Mice were orally gavaged with either 100 mg/kg of CB-1158 or an equivalent volume of vehicle control (water) every 12 h for 14 days. Mice were euthanized, and tumors excised and weights recorded. Myeloid deletion of Arg1 was confirmed via western blotting of IL-4-stimulated bone marrow-derived macrophages for all animals.

Adoptive T cell transfer studies

Activated gp100-specific CD8+ (Pmel-1) T cells were generated as described in Ya et al. [20]. Briefly, splenocytes from Pmel-1 TCR transgenic mice were isolated, pulsed with 1 μM of murine gp10025–33 (Anaspec, Fremont, CA) and expanded for 1 week in the presence of 60 IU/mL recombinant human IL-2 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ). Cells were >90% CD8+ Vβ13+ T cells as determined by flow cytometry. C57BL/6 mice were inoculated s.c. with B16 tumor cells. CB-1158 was administered by oral gavage twice per day at 100 mg/kg starting 1 day after tumor implant. On day 7, lymphopenia was induced by a non-myeloablative chemotherapy regimen of 250 mg/kg cyclophosphamide and 50 mg/kg fludarabine administered i.p. The chemotherapy regimen was administered to all groups. On day 9, mice were administered 1 × 106 Pmel-1 T cells intravenously (i.v.). Mice receiving Pmel-1 T cells also received recombinant human IL-2 (200,000 IU/dose) administered i.p. twice daily for 3 days starting the day of T cell transfer.

Adoptive NK cell transfer studies

Balb/c mice were inoculated i.v. with 105 CT26 cells. On the same day as tumor inoculation, 106 NK cells (isolated from Balb/c spleens the day before injection and incubated with recombinant IL-2 and IL-15 for 18 h) were transferred to the mice. The injected NK cells were profiled by flow cytometry to be CD25+ and 80–90% pure with less than 0.4% T cells. Mice were treated with vehicle or CB-1158 for 14 days and then lungs were harvested into Fekete’s solution and tumor nodules enumerated visually.

Tumor dissociation and flow cytometry

Tumor-bearing mice treated with vehicle or CB-1158 (100 mg/kg BID) were sacrificed for flow cytometry analysis on study day 9 (B16), day 10 (4T1), or day 14 (CT26 and LLC). Excised tumors were placed on ice in RPMI-1640 medium containing 5% FBS, minced with a razor blade, and dissociated in RPMI-1640 supplemented with mouse tumor dissociation enzymes (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) on a GentleMACS Octo Dissociator With Heat (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Dissociated tumors were strained through 70 μm nylon mesh, washed with cold PBS containing 2% FBS, blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 (Fc block antibody, eBioscience), and stained for cell surface antigens. For B16 and 4T1 tumors, washed dissociated tumor cells were incubated with Dead Cell Removal MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and applied to a magnetic column prior to staining. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using buffers purchased from R&D Systems or eBioscience for cytoplasmic or nuclear antigens, respectively. All tumor flow experiments were acquired on an Attune NxT flow cytometer and analyzed with FlowJo software version 10 (Ashland, OR), using fluorescence-minus-one controls for gating and single-stained OneComp eBeads (eBioscience) to set compensation matrices.

Gene expression analysis

LLC tumors from mice (N = 6 per group) treated with vehicle or CB-1158 (100 mg/kg twice daily) for 13 days were collected, placed into neutral buffered formalin overnight, transferred into 70% ethanol, and shipped to Core Diagnostics (Hayward, CA) for paraffin embedding. RNA was extracted for gene expression analysis and transcripts were quantified by NanoString Technologies (Seattle, WA).

Cytokine analysis

LLC tumors from mice (N = 5 per group) treated with vehicle or CB-1158 (200 mg/kg twice daily) for 14 days were collected and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tumors were homogenized in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 and protease inhibitors. The homogenate was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected and re-frozen. Cytokines in the supernatant were quantified by Myriad Rules Based Medicine (Austin, TX).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Automated IHC was performed by Indivumed (Hamburg, Germany) using the Discovery XT staining platform (Roche Diagnostics/Ventana Medical Systems, Mountain View, CA) on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples and tumor tissue microarrays (TMA). The rabbit anti-human Arg1 monoclonal antibody clone EPR6672(B) from Abcam/Epitomics (Burlingame, CA) was validated using 8 different cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and one sample of normal liver tissue as positive control tissue; normal tonsil tissue and isotype control antibody were used as negative controls. IHC was performed on 11 different tumor histologies: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, squamous and adenocarcinoma), breast cancer (triple negative and non-triple negative), gastric adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), prostate adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, and RCC. Arg1+ cells per mm2 were quantified by digital histopathology (OracleBio, Scotland, UK).

Multiparameter immunofluorescence

Tumor TMAs containing samples from patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma, CRC, RCC, esophageal carcinoma, and head and neck cancer were purchased from US Biomax and US Biolabs (Rockville, MD). Multiparameter immunofluorescence using the MultiOmyx platform for markers including Arg1, CD15, and CD68 was performed and analyzed by GE Clarient/NeoGenomics Laboratories (Aliso Viejo, CA).

Plasma Arg1 and L-arginine

The amount of Arg1 protein in plasma samples was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, BioVendor, Asheville, NC) in specimens from healthy volunteers and patients with head and neck cancer (N = 5), HCC (N = 3), mesothelioma (N = 3), CRC (N = 3), T cell prolymphocytic leukemia (N = 2), melanoma (N = 2), bladder cancer (N = 4), NSCLC (N = 11), small cell lung cancer (N = 17), undefined lung cancer (N = 6), acute myeloid leukemia (N = 9), RCC (N = 9), and breast cancer (N = 2). Plasma L-arginine was determined by mass spectrometry in samples from patients with mesothelioma (N = 3), CRC (N = 3), NSCLC (N = 9), small cell lung cancer (N = 3), undefined lung cancer (N = 3), head and neck cancer (N = 3), and T cell prolymphocytic leukemia (N = 2). All cancer patient samples were purchased from Conversant Biologics.

Results

CB-1158 was tested in biochemical and cellular assays for the ability to inhibit arginase enzymes from a variety of sources. CB-1158 inhibited recombinant human Arg1 (IC50 = 86 nM) and the related enzyme Arg2 (IC50 = 296 nM) (Table 1). Arg2 catalyzes an identical chemical reaction and shares 60% sequence identity with Arg1 and differs in its tissue distribution and subcellular localization [21]. A second enzyme class that also metabolizes L-arginine and is implicated in inflammation is NOS, which produces L-citrulline and the biological mediator NO [8]. CB-1158 was tested for the ability to inhibit the three NOS isoforms, endothelial NOS, neuronal NOS, and inducible NOS. No inhibition of NOS enzymes was observed in the presence of 50 μM CB-1158 (Table 1). These results show CB-1158 is a potent inhibitor of arginase with no activity against NOS.
Table 1

Biochemical potency of CB-1158 against arginase and NOS activity

 

CB-1158, IC50 (nM)

Purified enzyme assay

 Recombinant human Arg1

86 (±25)

 Recombinant human Arg2

296 (±5)

 Recombinant bovine endothelial NOS

N/A

 Rat cerebellar neuronal NOS

N/A

 Recombinant murine inducible NOS

N/A

Cell lysate assay

 Human granulocyte lysate

178 (±28)

 Human erythrocyte lysate

116

 Human hepatocyte lysate

158 (±23)

 Cancer patient plasma

122 (±32)

Mean IC50 values in nanomolar for CB-1158 inhibition of purified recombinant arginases or native arginases in cell lysates or cancer patient plasma. Standard deviations are indicated in parentheses. Recombinant Arg1 assays (N = 3) were performed in duplicate wells in the presence of 160 μM L-arginine. Recombinant Arg2 assays (N = 2) were performed in triplicate wells with 20 mM L-arginine. Arginase activity assays using human granulocyte lysate (N = 3), human erythrocyte lysate (N = 1), human hepatocyte lysate (N = 4), and cancer patient plasma (N = 5) were performed in duplicate wells with 160 μM L-arginine. Purified NOS enzyme activity was assayed in the presence 50 μM CB-1158, which showed no inhibitory activity against the three NOS isoforms

N/A not applicable

CB-1158 was next tested for the ability to inhibit native Arg1 in lysates of human granulocytes, peripheral blood erythrocytes, and primary hepatocytes [22–24]. We found that CB-1158 inhibited native arginase in lysates with similar potency to that observed for recombinant arginases (Table 1). In addition, Arg1 protein and activity have been reported to be elevated in the plasma of cancer patients compared to healthy donors [25, 26] and we observed inhibition of arginase activity by CB-1158 in plasma isolated from cancer patients (Table 1).

Granulocytic Arg1 is inactive until it is exocytosed [10, 23, 27], however active Arg1 is localized in the cytoplasm in other cell types, including liver hepatocytes. CB-1158 was next tested for the ability to inhibit endogenous arginase in intact cells. CB-1158 exhibited low potency against intracellular arginase in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line HepG2, the chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K-562, and primary human hepatocytes (Table 2). The low potency of CB-1158 against arginase in intact cells is likely due to inefficient penetration of CB-1158 across the cell membrane. These results show that CB-1158 is a potent and specific inhibitor of extracellular arginase.
Table 2

Potency of CB-1158 on arginase activity in intact cells

Intact cell assay

CB-1158, IC50 (μM)

Human HepG2 cell line

32 (±5.6)

Human K562 cell line

139 (±8.8)

Primary Human Hepatocytes

210

Mean IC50 values in micromolar for CB-1158 inhibition of arginase activity in intact cells. Standard deviations are indicated in parentheses. HepG2 (N = 3) and K562 (N = 2) cell lines were plated in duplicate wells in the presence of 10 mM L-arginine. For primary human hepatocytes (N = 1), arginase activity was measured in duplicate wells in the presence of media containing 10 mM L-ornithine and lacking L-arginine. Arginase activity was measured as production of urea in the media after 24 h

To determine if CB-1158 can restore lymphocyte proliferation in the context of immunosuppressive arginase-expressing myeloid cells, we first confirmed that lymphocytes require exogenous L-arginine to proliferate. Purified T cells or NK cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 or IL-2, respectively, in the presence or absence of L-arginine in the media. Proliferation of human and murine T cells (Fig. 1a, left) and NK cells (Fig. 1a, right) only occurred in media that contained L-arginine, as expected [10, 11, 28, 29].
Fig. 1

Inhibition of arginase reverses myeloid cell-mediated suppression of in vitro T cell proliferation. a T cells (left) and NK cells (right) require extracellular L-arginine for proliferation. CFSE-loaded T cells or NK cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 or IL-2, respectively, in media either containing or lacking L-arginine. Proliferation was measured after 72 h by flow cytometry. b Isolated human granulocytes deplete L-arginine from the media, measured after 48 h by LC/MS. c Human peripheral blood T cells are suppressed from anti-CD3/anti-CD28-induced proliferation by co-culture with granulocytes isolated from the same healthy donor. d left, CB-1158 inhibits the consumption of arginine from the media by granulocytes in a dose-dependent manner; right, CB-1158 inhibits granulocyte-mediated suppression of T-cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. The ratio of granulocytes to T cells in the co-cultures was 0.25 to 1. e, CB-1158 reverses T cell suppression conferred by granulocytic MDSCs. Media conditioned by granulocytic-MDSCs purified from a lung cancer patient’s blood inhibited T-cell proliferation and is depleted of L-arginine, and both effects are reversed in a dose-dependent manner by CB-1158. Left, arginine amounts in the media; right, T-cell proliferation. The ratio of MDSCs conditioning the media to T cells was 1 to 1. f, Conditioned media from purified granulocytes isolated from a head and neck cancer patient’s blood inhibited T-cell proliferation and are depleted of L-arginine, and both effects are reversed in a dose-dependent manner by CB-1158. Left, arginine amounts in the media; right, T-cell proliferation. The ratio of granulocytes conditioning the media to T cells was 0.5 to 1. g, CB-1158 reverses the inhibition of secretion of interferon-γ and granzyme-B conferred by cancer patient granulocytes. Media from panel (f) were analyzed by Cytometric Bead Array

To determine if arginase activity is necessary for myeloid cell-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation, T cell proliferation was assayed in co-culture with human myeloid cells in the presence or absence of CB-1158. Granulocytes are an abundant myeloid cell recruited from peripheral blood to sites of wound healing, infection [30], and the TME [25, 31]. Arg1 is stored in cytoplasmic granules and upon activation, which occurs spontaneously in vitro, granulocytes release active Arg1 into the extracellular milieu [10]. Purified human granulocytes from a healthy donor consumed L-arginine from the media (Fig. 1b). When activated granulocytes were co-cultured with autologous T cells, T cell proliferation was inhibited (Fig. 1c). The addition of CB-1158 blocked depletion of L-arginine from the media (Fig. 1d, left) and restored T cell proliferation to 90% of the proliferation observed for T cells without granulocytes (Fig. 1d, right). These results show that L-arginine depletion by Arg1 is necessary for granulocyte-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation in vitro, and that CB-1158 reverses this immunosuppression.

We next tested if CB-1158 could block T cell suppression conferred by myeloid cells derived from cancer patients. G-MDSC purified from the peripheral blood of a patient with lung cancer or granulocytes purified from a head and neck cancer patient were cultured for 48 h and the conditioned media were then used in T cell proliferation assays. T cells from healthy donors were used in lieu of the cancer patient donors’ T cells due to the limited amount of sample available from individual patients. Cancer patient-derived G-MDSCs or granulocytes reduced the amount of L-arginine in the media, and arginine depletion was blocked by CB-1158 (Fig. 1e and f, left panels). T cell proliferation was inhibited in the media conditioned by G-MDSC or granulocytes, and proliferation was restored to 99% or 79%, respectively, of control levels by the addition of CB-1158 (Fig. 1e and f, right panels). CB-1158 also restored secretion into the media of the T cell inflammatory cytokines interferon-γ and granzyme-B (Fig. 1g). Together these data demonstrate that inhibition of arginase by CB-1158 blocks myeloid cell-mediated immunosuppression, rescuing T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion.

To determine if arginase inhibition by CB-1158 could be tested for anti-tumor efficacy in mouse models of cancer, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed in tumor-bearing mice. Following a single dose of CB-1158 or BID dosing for 5 days, dose-dependent exposure of CB-1158 was observed in both plasma and tumors (Fig. 2a and b). Oral dosing of CB-1158 in tumor-bearing mice also raised the amount of L-arginine in plasma and tumors, indicating an on-target pharmacodynamic effect of CB-1158 (Figs. 2a and b). Importantly, CB-1158 was well-tolerated at doses of 100 mg/kg twice daily for 23 days, with no significant clinical observations or impact on body weight (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2

CB-1158 has favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties in vivo with no overt signs of toxicity. LLC tumor-bearing mice (N = 5 per group) were administered a single dose of CB-1158 (a) or 5 twice-daily doses (b) and samples were collected 2 h after the last dose. CB-1158 and L-arginine in plasma and tumor lysates were measured by LC/MS. c Body weights of mice inoculated with CT26 cells and dosed with vehicle or CB-1158 twice daily for 23 days. (**** P < 0.0001; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01 vs. vehicle)

CB-1158 was tested in multiple syngeneic murine models of cancer. Blocking arginase with CB-1158 significantly inhibited the growth of CT26, LLC, B16, and 4T1 tumors (Fig. 3a). Confirmation that CB-1158 targets Arg1 in vivo was assessed with a genetically altered mouse strain containing a conditional disruption of Arg1 in the myeloid lineage [14, 19, 32]. LLC cells injected into Arg flox/flox ; Tie2-Cre + mice (Fig. 3b, indicated as ARG1ΔM) grew smaller tumors that were similar in size to CB-1158-treated Arg flox/flox ; Tie2-Cre − mice (Fig. 3b, indicated as ARG1WT), and CB-1158 treatment of Arg flox/flox ; Tie2-Cre + animals conferred no further reduction in tumor growth, consistent with specific on-target inhibition of Arg1 by CB-1158 (Fig. 3b). Together, these results provide evidence that Arg1 activity promotes tumor growth and that elimination of myeloid cell Arg1 expression or pharmacological blockade of arginase by CB-1158 limits tumor growth in vivo.
Fig. 3

Arginase inhibition reduces tumor growth in vivo. a CB-1158, dosed at 100 mg/kg twice daily, reduced tumor growth as a single agent in multiple syngeneic mouse models of cancer (N = 10 per group). b Mice lacking Arg1 gene expression in the myeloid compartment (indicated as ARG1ΔM) grow smaller tumors than mice containing wild-type Arg1 (indicated as ARG1WT), and treatment of ARG1ΔM mice with CB-1158 does not further reduce tumor growth, indicating on-target activity of CB-1158 (N = 16 per group). (T test: **** P < 0.0001; * P < 0.05)

A series of experiments was performed to address the in vivo mechanism of action of CB-1158. First, we confirmed that CB-1158 is not directly cytotoxic to murine cancer cell lines by assaying the growth of CT26, LLC, B16, and 4T1 cell lines in the presence of a dose-titration of CB-1158. No growth inhibition of murine cancer cell lines was observed in the presence of 1 mM CB-1158 (Fig. 4a). Next, to test if the mechanism of in vivo efficacy of CB-1158 is immune cell-mediated, CB-1158 was administered to LLC tumor-bearing SCID mice. The efficacy of CB-1158 was abrogated in the SCID background (Fig. 4b), indicating CB-1158 requires an intact immune system to inhibit tumor growth. To confirm the immune cell-mediated mechanism of action of CB-1158, tumor growth was assessed in mice lacking immune cell subsets. Depletion of either CD8+ cells or NK cells in the B16 (Fig. 4c) and CT26 (Fig. 4d) tumor models blocked the efficacy of CB-1158, indicating that both CD8+ cells and NK cells are required for the full anti-tumor effect of CB-1158 in these models. In the LLC tumor model, depletion of NK cells resulted in loss of efficacy, while depletion of CD8+ cells had a smaller effect (Fig. 4e). Collectively, these results indicate that the anti-tumor effect of CB-1158 is mediated by the immune system and requires cytotoxic lymphocytes.
Fig. 4

CB-1158 requires an intact immune system for efficacy. a CellTiterGlo assays (72 h) were performed on the indicated cell lines with a dose-titration of CB-1158. b B6.CB17-Prkdc (SCID)/SzJ mice were implanted with LLC cells and CB-1158 was dosed 100 mg/kg twice daily. c-e Tumor growth inhibition by CB-1158 in the B16 (c), CT26 (d), and LLC (e) models is mediated by CD8+ and NK cells. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with depleting antibodies and dosed twice-daily with vehicle or 100 mg/kg CB-1158. Tumors from LLC studies were analyzed on study day 13 (CD8+ cell depletion) or study day 14 (NK cell depletion). (**** P < 0.0001; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01)

To further investigate the immune cell-mediated mechanism of action of CB-1158, flow cytometry was performed on tumors from animals treated with vehicle or CB-1158 and changes in specific immune cell populations were quantified. In each of the models where tumor growth was inhibited by CB-1158, we observed statistically significant changes in immune cell populations indicative of an increase in inflammation in the TME (Fig. 5). In the CT26 (Fig. 5a) and B16 (Fig. 5b) models, CB-1158 treatment resulted in an increase in tumor-infiltrating activated CD8+ CD25+ cytotoxic T cells compared to vehicle-treated controls. In the LLC model, CB-1158 treatment caused an increase in CD8+ T cells in the tumor, as well as a decrease in CD68+ macrophages, compared to vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 5c). In the 4T1 model, where CB-1158 had a modest effect on tumor growth, we nevertheless observed changes in immune cell populations consistent with increased inflammation in the tumor: an increase in CD3+ T cells, an increase in NK cells, and a decrease in myeloid cells in the tumors of CB-1158-treated animals compared to vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 5d). Consistent with increased inflammation in the tumors of CB-1158-treated animals compared to vehicle controls, CB-1158 was linked to increases in transcripts of interferon-responsive genes (Fig. 5e) and increases in inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 5f). Taken together, our data indicate that the molecular mechanism of tumor growth inhibition by CB-1158 is immune cell-mediated and results from an increase in inflammation in the tumor microenvironment that includes an increase in cytotoxic lymphocytes and a decrease in myeloid cells.
Fig. 5

CB-1158-treated animals have increased tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic cells and decreased myeloid cells. a CT26 tumors from animals treated with CB-1158 had increased CD8+ CD25+ T cells as determined by flow cytometry compared to vehicle-treated animals on study day 14 (N = 10 per group). b In the B16 model, CB-1158 treatment resulted in an increase in CD25+ CD8+ T cells observed on study day 9 (N = 10 per group). c In the LLC model, CB-1158 treatment resulted in increased tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells and decreased CD68+ myeloid cells observed on study day 14 (N = 10 per group). d In the 4T1 model, CB-1158 treatment resulted in increases in both T cells and NK cells and a decrease in myeloid cells observed on study day 10 (N = 10 per group). e CB-1158 increases T cell and NK cell markers and interferon response genes. mRNA transcripts in LLC tumors from mice treated with vehicle or 100 mg/kg CB-1158 twice daily were determined by Nanostring (N = 6 per group). f Cytokines and chemokines in LLC tumors from mice treated with vehicle or 200 mg/kg CB-1158 twice daily were determined by Luminex (N = 5 per group). (T test: ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05)

In growing tumors, effective immunity may be blocked by more than one suppressive mechanism, including expression of immune checkpoint proteins and depletion of essential nutrients from the TME [33–35]. We reasoned that combining CB-1158 with other immune-modulating agents might further reduce tumor growth and tested this idea with four different combinations. First, CT26 tumor-bearing mice were treated with CB-1158 in combination with the checkpoint blockade therapy anti-PD-L1. While tumor growth was reduced with CB-1158 or anti-PD-L1 as monotherapies, tumor growth inhibition was enhanced by combining the two agents (Fig. 6a, left). Complete tumor regression was achieved in three out of ten mice treated with anti-PD-L1 alone, whereas the combination therapy resulted in six complete responses (Fig. 6a, center), with 90% survival at study day 46 for the combination group compared to 30% survival for the anti-PD-L1 single agent group (Fig. 6a, right). Combination efficacy with checkpoint blockade therapy was further explored in the orthotopic 4T1 tumor model, where the addition of CB-1158 to the doublet regimen of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 resulted in a significant reduction in growth of the primary tumor as well as a decrease in the number of lung metastases (Fig. 6b). Next, we used two different cellular immunotherapies in combination with CB-1158. B16 tumor-bearing mice treated with CB-1158 in combination with T cells specific for the PMEL tumor antigen exhibited significantly reduced tumor growth compared to mice treated with either single agent (Fig. 6c). Of note, the significant tumor growth inhibition in mice treated with the combination of CB-1158 plus T cells is consistent with the striking survival benefit that was reported for T cell therapy in mice deleted for myeloid Arg1 [32]. We also used NK cell therapy in a lung metastasis model. CT26 tumor-bearing mice treated with CB-1158 in combination with NK cells had significantly fewer lung metastases compared to control groups (Fig. 6d). These results indicate that CB-1158 may be an attractive combination agent with other immuno therapies.
Fig. 6

CB-1158 combines with immune checkpoint blockade, T cell transfer, or NK cell transfer to inhibit tumor growth. a CB-1158 in combination with PD-L1 blockade inhibited tumor growth in the CT26 model. Growth curves (left and center) and survival curves (right) are shown. N = 10 per group. b CB-1158 combined with CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade to inhibit tumor growth and lung metastases in the 4T1 tumor model. N = 10 per group. c CB-1158 and adoptive T cell transfer inhibited tumor growth in the B16 model. Non-myeloablative chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine (C/F) was administered to all groups, and IL-2 was dosed to groups receiving T cells. On study day 9, Pmel-1 T cells were transferred to mice in the T cell groups (ACT). N = 10 per group. d CB-1158 and adoptive NK cell transfer reduced lung metastases in the CT26 model. N = 6 control; N = 7 CB-1158; N = 5 NK cells; N = 5 CB-1158 + NK cells. (T test: **** P < 0.0001; *** P < 0.001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05)

Some standard-of-care chemotherapeutics have been observed to modulate the immune infiltrate [36, 37]. While the primary mechanism of action of gemcitabine, a nucleoside analog, is considered to be inhibition of DNA synthesis, it has also been observed to reduce MDSCs [38–40]. Therefore, we reasoned that gemcitabine may augment the activity of CB-1158. Indeed, CB-1158 treatment in combination with gemcitabine resulted in a significant increase in tumor growth inhibition in the CT26, LLC, and 4T1 tumor models (Fig. 7a). We investigated the mechanism of action of the combination of CB-1158 and gemcitabine treatment in the CT26 tumor model by performing flow cytometry on these tumors. Gemcitabine treatment resulted in a significant decrease in CD11b+ myeloid cells in the tumors (Fig. 7b). We note that although gemcitabine can be toxic to immune cells, both lymphocytes and myeloid cells remained present in gemcitabine-treated animals with the dose regimen that was used. Interestingly, NK cells and inflammatory (M1-type, CD80+) macrophages were significantly increased, while immunosuppressive (M2-type, CD206+) macrophages were significantly reduced in tumors of animals treated with the combination of CB-1158 and gemcitabine, indicating an increase in inflammation and a decrease in immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment (Fig. 7b).
Fig. 7

CB-1158 combines with gemcitabine to inhibit tumor growth. a CB-1158 in combination with gemcitabine treatment in the CT26 model (left), the LLC model (center), or the 4T1 model (right) inhibited tumor growth. N = 10 per group. b On study day 14, CT26 tumors from animals treated with CB-1158 and gemcitabine had decreased myeloid cells (upper left), increased NK cells (upper right), decreased suppressive macrophages (lower left), and increased inflammatory macrophages (lower right) as determined by flow cytometry compared to vehicle-treated animals

To investigate which tumor types may be more likely to respond to arginase inhibition, we interrogated human tumor microarrays by immunohistochemistry for Arg1 protein expression. The Arg1 antibody was validated using normal liver tissue as a positive control and normal tonsil tissue as a negative control (Fig. 8b). We found an abundance of Arg1+ infiltrating immune cells in multiple tumor types, with especially high numbers in tumors of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, and bladder (Fig. 8a and d). Tumor cells were largely negative for Arg1 staining with the exception of HCC (Fig. 8c). Tumor tissue microarrays were also stained by multi-parameter immunofluorescence for Arg1 and other immune cell markers, and we found that Arg1 was more frequently associated with the granulocytic marker CD15 than with the macrophage marker CD68 (Fig. 8e), and in some cases, striking co-localization between Arg1 and CD15 was observed (Fig. 8f). These data confirm Arg1 expression in multiple tumor types.
Fig. 8

Arginase 1 is abundant in multiple types of cancer. a Immunohistochemistry of human tumor tissue microarrays stained with an anti-Arg1 antibody were quantified for Arg1-positive infiltrating granulocytes by digital histopathology. b-d Immunohistochemistry staining for Arg1 in sections of normal human tissues (N = 33 tissues analyzed) and human tumor tissues (N = 12 tumor histologies analyzed). Representative images are shown. Red arrows point to arginase-expressing myeloid cells. e Percentage of Arg1-positive cells that co-express the granulocyte marker, CD15, or macrophage marker, CD68, in tumor tissue microarrays as determined by quantitation of MultiOmyx immunofluorescence. f Immunofluorescent staining (MultiOmyx) of a tumor section from a patient with head & neck cancer shows numerous Arg1-positive granulocytes. g Plasma Arg1 protein determined by ELISA from cancer patients (N = 76 from 13 different histologies) and healthy volunteers (N = 31). h Plasma L-arginine determined by LC/MS from cancer patients (N = 26 from 7 different histologies) and healthy volunteers (N = 20). (**** P < 0.0001 vs. healthy donor)

In addition to tumor expression, Arg1 protein and activity have been observed in the peripheral blood and have been reported to be higher in the plasma of some cancer patients compared to healthy volunteers [25]. To investigate whether the amount of Arg1 is higher in cancer patients than in healthy donors, Arg1 protein was measured in the plasma of 31 healthy donors and 76 cancer patients across 13 different histologies (see Methods). Arg1 was significantly higher for cancer patients compared to the healthy volunteers (Fig. 8g). Peripheral blood L-arginine has also been reported to be lower in cancer patients [25, 26]. Plasma L-arginine was measured for 20 healthy volunteers and 26 cancer patients across 7 different histologies. L-arginine was significantly lower for the cancer patients compared to the healthy individuals (Fig. 8h). These results suggest that cancer patients may experience immune suppression that is associated with higher circulating Arg1 and lower amounts of L-arginine compared to healthy individuals, and that inhibiting circulating Arg1 and raising plasma L-arginine with CB-1158 could confer an immune benefit in the context of cancer.

Discussion

We reasoned that raising arginine levels would be immune-stimulatory in the context of cancer for the following reasons: first, cytotoxic lymphocytes require exogenous arginine for proliferation in response to in vitro stimulation [10, 11, 28, 29]; second, many cancer patients are immunosuppressed and have lower plasma arginine compared to healthy individuals [25, 26]; and lastly, activated immunosuppressive myeloid cells consume arginine and compete with other arginine auxotrophs such as cytotoxic lymphocytes in the TME for this amino acid [8, 12]. Thus, raising arginine in cancer patients could be critical for the immune system to mount an effective anti-tumor response.

Arginine depletion by myeloid cells is primarily mediated by the enzymes Arg1 and NOS [8]. While there is conflicting data regarding the role of NOS in inflammation [32, 41], Arg1 activity in myeloid cells has been shown to be immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic: first, Arg1-expressing myeloid cells consume arginine from the media and suppress T cell activity in co-culture, and importantly, T cell proliferation can be restored either by restoring arginine to the media or by the addition of an arginase inhibitor, showing that arginase activity is necessary for the observed immune suppression (Fig. 1) [10, 11, 25, 42, 43]. Secondly, genetic ablation of Arg1 in the myeloid compartment of tumor-bearing mice was shown to reduce tumor growth, indicative of a pro-tumorigenic and immune suppressive role for Arg1 in vivo [13, 14, 19, 32]. Thirdly, blocking arginase activity pharmacologically with nor-NOHA [15] or CB-1158 (this report) reduces tumor growth. The present study additionally demonstrates that Arg1 inhibition with CB-1158 raises tumor and plasma arginine and increases inflammation in the TME. Together these data argue that arginase activity is immunosuppressive and provide validation for arginase as a cancer immunotherapy drug target. A second arginase isoform, Arg2 is a constitutively-expressed mitochondrial matrix protein found at low levels in many tissues and at high levels in kidney and intestine [21]. Since Arg2 activity also affects plasma L-arginine levels, Arg2 could also be a regulator of immune function. In support of this notion, Arg2 has been reported to promote maternal-fetal immune tolerance [44].

A potential concern with systemic arginase inhibition is interrupting its function within the urea cycle, an important pathway in the liver for detoxifying ammonia generated from the breakdown of amino acids. In spite of this concern, pharmacological arginase inhibition has been well-tolerated in several animal studies, including one study involving a rat model of hypertension in which nor-NOHA was injected over a period of 10 weeks [45], as well as multi-day studies of nor-NOHA in mice [15]. In addition, we have observed that twice-daily oral dosing of CB-1158 was well-tolerated in mice for at least 40 days. Lack of apparent hepatic toxicity may be explained by several observations. First, CB-1158 does not readily enter cells, exhibiting IC50 values for intracellular arginase in the HepG2 and K562 cell lines that are two orders of magnitude higher than for soluble arginases in cell lysates (Tables 1 and 2). Secondly, the subcellular localization and regulation of urea cycle Arg1 may protect it from pharmacological inhibition. In hepatocytes, urea cycle Arg1 is tightly associated at the mitochondria in a multi-enzyme complex, and studies using semi-permeabilized cells and radiolabeled substrate have demonstrated that tight channeling of product and substrate occurs among successive enzymes of the urea cycle: argininosuccinate synthase, argininosuccinate lyase, and arginase [46]. Thus, hepatic Arg1 may be less accessible to CB-1158 compared to cytoplasmic or extracellular arginase in plasma, tumors, and inflamed tissues. When we tested CB-1158 for the ability to inhibit arginase in intact primary hepatocytes (Table 2), we used media containing ornithine, not arginine, and to our knowledge, urea generated under these conditions should require a complete urea cycle. Therefore, this assay may be a measure of the Arg1 activity that is exclusively associated with the urea cycle. However we note that the low potency of CB-1158 on primary hepatocytes could also be due to the inability of CB-1158 to penetrate the cell membrane.

Arginine supplementation has been investigated as a potential therapy for cancer patients and the clinical results suggest that raising arginine levels may be beneficial. In one study of 18 colorectal cancer patients undergoing tumor resection, histopathologic analysis of biopsies revealed that supplementation of arginine prior to surgery resulted in an increase in CD16+ and CD56+ NK cells infiltrating the tumors [47]. In another study of 96 breast cancer patients, a significant increase in pathological response was observed in patients with small tumors receiving arginine compared to placebo [48]. These data indicate that supplemental arginine may have an immune-stimulatory and anti-tumor effect in cancer patients, and suggest that raising systemic arginine by pharmacological arginase inhibition would be similarly beneficial. However, major limitations to therapeutic oral arginine supplementation include severe gastrointestinal distress and extensive metabolism of arginine by the intestinal mucosa [9, 49–51]. CB-1158 treatment has the potential to both augment and maintain arginine levels in patients thereby avoiding the gastrointestinal distress and arginine oscillations inherent to dietary arginine supplementation.

Antibodies to T cell checkpoint proteins CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 have resulted in durable clinical responses for some cancer patients, but many patients do not respond [52, 53], suggesting that overcoming additional immunosuppressive mechanisms will be necessary to reactivate anti-tumor immunity in resistant patients. The cellular and molecular basis of resistance to checkpoint blockade is an area of intense investigation. Biomarker studies examining responsive and resistant patients point to a suppressive TME as one possibility to explain resistance. Patients with a higher baseline level of T cells infiltrating the tumor (T cell-inflamed tumors) compared to non-responsive tumors (cold tumors) were more likely to respond to anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 therapies [54], and patients resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy had higher baseline levels of tumor-infiltrating MDSCs compared to responders [55]. Furthermore, pre-clinical studies have shown that the depletion of essential extracellular metabolites in the TME, such as glucose and amino acids, can block T cell effector function [56, 57]. Together, these results suggest that immunosuppressive myeloid cells and depletion of essential metabolites may give rise to cold tumors that are resistant to checkpoint blockade and therefore targeting these myeloid cells and metabolic regulatory pathways, in combination with checkpoint antibodies, could restore inflammation and increase patient response rates. In support of this hypothesis, epacadostat, which inhibits the enzyme IDO-1 and prevents depletion of the essential amino acid tryptophan from the TME, is exhibiting striking results in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with melanoma, lung cancer, RCC, or head and neck carcinoma [58–62], arguing that targeting T cell checkpoints and immunosuppression by the TME is an efficacious combination.

Conclusions

In this report, we have shown that inhibition of arginase with CB-1158, a potent, selective, and orally-bioavailable small molecule, reverses suppression of T cell proliferation by blocking arginine depletion. CB-1158 reduced tumor growth in mouse models of cancer by increasing inflammation in the TME, confirming an immune-modulatory mechanism of action in vivo. In addition, CB-1158 treatment of tumor-bearing mice enhanced the efficacy of checkpoint blockade, adoptive T cell therapy, adoptive NK cell therapy, and gemcitabine treatment. A survey of human tumor microarrays and cancer patient plasma confirmed Arg1 expression is elevated in human cancer. These findings provide strong rationale for the clinical development of CB-1158 as an anti-cancer therapeutic agent. A Phase 1 study (NCT02903914) has been initiated to test the anti-tumor activity of CB-1158, as a monotherapy and in combination with anti-PD-1, in order to add to the armamentarium of agents that activate the immune system to fight cancer.

Abbreviations

Arg1: 

Arginase 1

Arg2: 

Arginase 2

CFSE: 

Carboxy-fluorescein succinimidyl ester

CRC: 

Colorectal cancer

DC: 

Dendritic cell

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

FFPE: 

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded

G-MDSC: 

Granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

i.p.: 

Intraperitoneally

i.v.: 

Intravenously

IDO-1: 

Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

MDSC: 

Myeloid-derived suppressor cell

NK: 

Natural killer

NO: 

Nitric oxide

NOS: 

Nitric oxide synthase

PD-L1: 

Programmed death ligand 1

RCC: 

Renal cell carcinoma

s.c.: 

Subcutaneously

SCID: 

Severe combined immune deficient

TAM: 

Tumor-associated macrophage

TCR: 

T cell antigen receptor

TMA: 

Tissue microarray

TME: 

Tumor microenvironment

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Members of the Murray group are acknowledged for their help in performing in vivo studies at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.

Funding

All studies were funded by Calithera Biosciences.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SMS designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. AM and ALM designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and contributed to writing the manuscript. JC, EE, TH, JRJ, GM, SN, AP, MLMR, LV, MW, JZ, TZ, and WZ designed and performed experiments and analyzed data. WL, MKB, and PM designed experiments and analyzed data. MIG and FP designed experiments, analyzed the data, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Due to the number of contributors, all authors, except first and last, are listed alphabetically by last name.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All mice were housed and treated in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. No humans were treated in this study and therefore ethical approval per Helsinki Declaration was not required. Human blood and tissue samples obtained from commercial sources were collected expressly by the vendor for research purposes and no consent to participate in this study was required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors were employees and shareholders of Calithera Biosciences at the time the work was performed, with the exception of P.J.M. and L.V., whose studies using CB-1158 were funded by Calithera Biosciences.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Calithera Biosciences, South San Francisco, USA
(2)
Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
(3)
Departments of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, USA

References

  1. Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, Nair VS, Xu Y, Khuong A, Hoang CD, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):938–45.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(4):253–68.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellone M, Elia AR. Constitutive and acquired mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in human cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017;36:17–24.Google Scholar
  4. Waldron TJ, Quatromoni JG, Karakasheva TA, Singhal S, Rustgi AK. Myeloid derived suppressor cells: targets for therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2(4):e24117.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Engblom C, Pfirschke C, Pittet MJ. The role of myeloid cells in cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(7):447–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Parker KH, Beury DW, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: critical cells driving immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Cancer Res. 2015;128:95–139.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruffell B, Coussens LM. Macrophages and therapeutic resistance in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(4):462–72.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC, Al-Khami AA. Arginine metabolism in myeloid cells shapes innate and adaptive immunity. Front Immunol. 2017;8:93.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morris SM, Jr.: Recent advances in arginine metabolism: roles and regulation of the arginases. Br J Pharmacol 2009, 157(6):922–930.Google Scholar
  10. Munder M, Schneider H, Luckner C, Giese T, Langhans CD, Fuentes JM, Kropf P, Mueller I, Kolb A, Modolell M, et al. Suppression of T-cell functions by human granulocyte arginase. Blood. 2006;108(5):1627–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, DeSalvo J, Culotta KS, Zabaleta J, Quiceno DG, Ochoa JB, Ochoa AC. L-arginine consumption by macrophages modulates the expression of CD3 zeta chain in T lymphocytes. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2003;171(3):1232–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Murray PJ. Amino acid auxotrophy as a system of immunological control nodes. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(2):132–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pesce JT, Ramalingam TR, Mentink-Kane MM, Wilson MS, El Kasmi KC, Smith AM, Thompson RW, Cheever AW, Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Arginase-1-expressing macrophages suppress Th2 cytokine-driven inflammation and fibrosis. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(4):e1000371.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Colegio OR, Chu NQ, Szabo AL, Chu T, Rhebergen AM, Jairam V, Cyrus N, Brokowski CE, Eisenbarth SC, Phillips GM, et al. Functional polarization of tumour-associated macrophages by tumour-derived lactic acid. Nature. 2014;513(7519):559–63.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodriguez PC, Quiceno DG, Zabaleta J, Ortiz B, Zea AH, Piazuelo MB, Delgado A, Correa P, Brayer J, Sotomayor EM, et al. Arginase I production in the tumor microenvironment by mature myeloid cells inhibits T-cell receptor expression and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 2004;64(16):5839–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eric B. Sjogren JL, Michael Van Zandt, Darren Whitehouse: Compositions and Methods for Inhibiting Arginase Activity. In: United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States: Calithera Biosciences, Inc.; May 4, 2017.Google Scholar
  17. Sawant A, Schafer CC, Jin TH, Zmijewski J, Tse HM, Roth J, Sun Z, Siegal GP, Thannickal VJ, Grant SC, et al. Enhancement of antitumor immunity in lung cancer by targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cell pathways. Cancer Res. 2013;73(22):6609–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ko HJ, Kim YJ, Kim YS, Chang WS, Ko SY, Chang SY, Sakaguchi S, Kang CY. A combination of chemoimmunotherapies can efficiently break self-tolerance and induce antitumor immunity in a tolerogenic murine tumor model. Cancer Res. 2007;67(15):7477–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. El Kasmi KC, Qualls JE, Pesce JT, Smith AM, Thompson RW, Henao-Tamayo M, Basaraba RJ, Konig T, Schleicher U, Koo MS, et al. Toll-like receptor-induced arginase 1 in macrophages thwarts effective immunity against intracellular pathogens. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(12):1399–406.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ya Z, Hailemichael Y, Overwijk W, Restifo NP. Mouse model for pre-clinical study of human cancer immunotherapy. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2015;108:20.21.21–43.Google Scholar
  21. Ash DE: Structure and function of arginases. The Journal of nutrition 2004, 134(10 Suppl):2760S–2764S; discussion 2765S–2767S.Google Scholar
  22. Bernard A, Kasten M, Meier C, Manning E, Freeman S, Adams W, Chang P, Boulanger B, Kearney P. Red blood cell arginase suppresses Jurkat (T cell) proliferation by depleting arginine. Surgery. 2008;143(2):286–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Munder M, Mollinedo F, Calafat J, Canchado J, Gil-Lamaignere C, Fuentes JM, Luckner C, Doschko G, Soler G, Eichmann K, et al. Arginase I is constitutively expressed in human granulocytes and participates in fungicidal activity. Blood. 2005;105(6):2549–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu G, Morris SM Jr. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. The Biochemical journal. 1998;336(Pt 1):1–17.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodriguez PC, Ernstoff MS, Hernandez C, Atkins M, Zabaleta J, Sierra R, Ochoa AC. Arginase I-Producing myeloid-derived suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma are a subpopulation of activated granulocytes. Cancer Res. 2009;69(4):1553–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zea AH, Rodriguez PC, Atkins MB, Hernandez C, Signoretti S, Zabaleta J, McDermott D, Quiceno D, Youmans A, O'Neill A, et al. Arginase-producing myeloid suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma patients: a mechanism of tumor evasion. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3044–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rotondo R, Barisione G, Mastracci L, Grossi F, Orengo AM, Costa R, Truini M, Fabbi M, Ferrini S, Barbieri O. IL-8 induces exocytosis of arginase 1 by neutrophil polymorphonuclears in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(4):887–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamas B, Vergnaud-Gauduchon J, Goncalves-Mendes N, Perche O, Rossary A, Vasson MP, Farges MC. Altered functions of natural killer cells in response to L-arginine availability. Cell Immunol. 2012;280(2):182–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Oberlies J, Watzl C, Giese T, Luckner C, Kropf P, Muller I, Ho AD, Munder M. Regulation of NK cell function by human granulocyte arginase. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950), 2009. 182(9):5259–67.Google Scholar
  30. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(3):159–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim J, Bae JS. Tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils in tumor microenvironment. Mediat Inflamm. 2016;2016:6058147.Google Scholar
  32. Marigo I, Zilio S, Desantis G, Mlecnik B, Agnellini AH, Ugel S, Sasso MS, Qualls JE, Kratochvill F, Zanovello P, et al. T cell cancer therapy requires CD40-CD40L activation of tumor necrosis factor and inducible nitric-oxide-synthase-producing dendritic cells. Cancer Cell. 2016;30(3):377–90.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Cotechini T, Medler TR, Coussens LM. Myeloid Cells as Targets for Therapy in Solid Tumors. Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass). 2015;21(4):343–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Munn DH, Bronte V. Immune suppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;39:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spranger S, Gajewski T. Rational combinations of immunotherapeutics that target discrete pathways. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. 2013;1:16.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Duffy AG, Greten TF. Immunological off-target effects of standard treatments in gastrointestinal cancers. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Med Oncol. 2014;25(1):24–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Najjar YG, Finke JH. Clinical perspectives on targeting of myeloid derived suppressor cells in the treatment of cancer. Front Oncol. 2013;3:49.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Eriksson E, Wenthe J, Irenaeus S, Loskog A, Ullenhag G. Gemcitabine reduces MDSCs, tregs and TGFbeta-1 while restoring the teff/treg ratio in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):282.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Le HK, Graham L, Cha E, Morales JK, Manjili MH, Bear HD. Gemcitabine directly inhibits myeloid derived suppressor cells in BALB/c mice bearing 4T1 mammary carcinoma and augments expansion of T cells from tumor-bearing mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9(7–8):900–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Suzuki E, Kapoor V, Jassar AS, Kaiser LR, Albelda SM. Gemcitabine selectively eliminates splenic gr-1+/CD11b+ myeloid suppressor cells in tumor-bearing animals and enhances antitumor immune activity. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2005;11(18):6713–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Mocellin S, Bronte V, Nitti D. Nitric oxide, a double edged sword in cancer biology: searching for therapeutic opportunities. Med Res Rev. 2007;27(3):317–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bronte V, Serafini P, De Santo C, Marigo I, Tosello V, Mazzoni A, Segal DM, Staib C, Lowel M, Sutter G, et al. IL-4-induced arginase 1 suppresses alloreactive T cells in tumor-bearing mice. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2003;170(1):270–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Van de Velde LA, Subramanian C, Smith AM, Barron L, Qualls JE, Neale G, Alfonso-Pecchio A, Jackowski S, Rock CO, Wynn TA, et al. T cells encountering myeloid cells programmed for amino acid-dependent immunosuppression use Rictor/mTORC2 protein for proliferative checkpoint decisions. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(1):15–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McGovern N, Shin A, Low G, Low D, Duan K, Yao LJ, Msallam R, Low I, Shadan NB, Sumatoh HR, et al. Human fetal dendritic cells promote prenatal T-cell immune suppression through arginase-2. Nature. 2017;Google Scholar
  45. Bagnost T, Ma L, da Silva RF, Rezakhaniha R, Houdayer C, Stergiopulos N, Andre C, Guillaume Y, Berthelot A, Demougeot C. Cardiovascular effects of arginase inhibition in spontaneously hypertensive rats with fully developed hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;87(3):569–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Cheung CW, Cohen NS, Raijman L. Channeling of urea cycle intermediates in situ in permeabilized hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(7):4038–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Heys SD, Segar A, Payne S, Bruce DM, Kernohan N, Eremin O. Dietary supplementation with L-arginine: modulation of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):238–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Heys SD, Ogston K, Miller I, Hutcheon AW, Walker LG, Sarker TK, Dewar J, Ah-See AK, Eremin O. Potentiation of the response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer by dietary supplementation with L-arginine: results of a randomised controlled trial. Int J Oncol. 1998;12(1):221–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Collier SR, Casey DP, Kanaley JA. Growth hormone responses to varying doses of oral arginine. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2005;15(2):136–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Grimble GK. Adverse gastrointestinal effects of arginine and related amino acids. The Journal of nutrition. 2007;137(6 Suppl 2):1693s–701s.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu G. Intestinal mucosal amino acid catabolism. J Nutr. 1998;128(8):1249–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahoney KM, Freeman GJ, McDermott DF. The next immune-checkpoint inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in melanoma. Clin Ther. 2015;37(4):764–82.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Somasundaram A, Burns TF. The next generation of immunotherapy: keeping lung cancer in check. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):87.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gajewski TF. The next hurdle in cancer immunotherapy: overcoming the non-T-cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment. Semin Oncol. 2015;42(4):663–71.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, Berent-Maoz B, Pang J, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic features of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Cell. 2016;165(1):35–44.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Chang CH, Pearce EL. Emerging concepts of T cell metabolism as a target of immunotherapy. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(4):364–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Renner K, Singer K, Koehl GE, Geissler EK, Peter K, Siska PJ, Kreutz M. Metabolic hallmarks of tumor and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2017;8:248.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Beatty GL, O'Dwyer PJ, Clark J, Shi JG, Bowman KJ, Scherle PA, Newton RC, Schaub R, Maleski J, Leopold L et al: First-in-human phase I study of the oral inhibitor of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase-1 Epacadostat (INCB024360) in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2017.Google Scholar
  59. Gangadhar TC, Schneider BJ, Bauer TM, Wasser JS, Spira AI, Patel SP, Balmanoukian AS, Bauml J, Schmidt EV, Zhao Y et al: Efficacy and safety of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab treatment of NSCLC: Preliminary phase I/II results of ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35(15_suppl):9014–9014.Google Scholar
  60. Hamid O, Bauer TM, Spira AI, Olszanski AJ, Patel SP, Wasser JS, Smith DC, Balmanoukian AS, Aggarwal C, Schmidt EV et al: Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab in patients with SCCHN: Preliminary phase I/II results from ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35(15_suppl):6010–6010.Google Scholar
  61. Lara P, Bauer TM, Hamid O, Smith DC, Gajewski T, Gangadhar TC, Somer BG, Schmidt EV, Zhao Y, Gowda H et al: Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced RCC: Preliminary phase I/II results from ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35(15_suppl):4515–4515.Google Scholar
  62. Perez RP, Riese MJ, Lewis KD, Saleh MN, Daud A, Berlin J, Lee JJ, Mukhopadhyay S, Zhou L, Serbest G et al: Epacadostat plus nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: Preliminary phase I/II results of ECHO-204. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35(15_suppl):3003–3003.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

ISSN: 2051-1426

Contact us